The One Is Indivisible
The Truth Is The Whole
Putin, Modi, Trump, all Sissi, and Abe should agree
an outcome for MENA then make it happen.
However, Singh is optimistic: “This [is an] extremely winnable race because nobody likes Cory Booker. Also, people are sick of the fact that the left-wing policies [are] choking the common family. Right now, it’s just unaffordable.”
Between reviling the Names of God (and here) and fearing ChiCom and Arab/Pan-African Imperialists, schoolmen, long since themselves Transgressive, are powerless to respond maturely to the bi-directional imperialist attack against them, instead synergizing it. They shed already, voluntarily, their most potent weapon, armor, and strategic/tactical advantages: Theology. Transgressives are infantilizing themselves.
Sarah Hoyt: Also, do remember kiddies,
you can vote your way into socialism,
but you have to shoot your way out.
I have observed that Americans are under attack from three directions, by three forces, three-heads of a Hydra-like domestic enemy named officially as the US IC/FPE — Intelligence Community/Foreign Policy Establishment — and unofficially as The Deep State and The Administrative State.
These three forces, the three-heads of the Hydra-like domestic enemy to Americans and America, are:
ChiComs,
Salafi-Shiite Jihadis,
Euro-American Socialists.
The US IC/FPE comprises material numbers of elected representatives and unelected officials, sniping, snipping heads, operating as one or more of these three forces. ChiComs, Salafi-Shiite Jihadis, and Euro-American Socialists veritably own Americans’ IC/FPE/Deep State/Administrative State. That is the measure of the danger faced by Americans and America.
The US HPSCI Conducts A Superb Civics Lesson
Deep State And Ikhwan Are Co-Terminus
Two of these heads have been identified by the generality of Americans and counter-attacked by their representatives: ChiComs and Euro-American Socialists. These heads are not defeated but they are in retreat and their power to intimidate and subjugate is spent.
One head remains rampant: Salafi-Shiite Jihadis. It has been identified by the generality of Americans, who have demanded counter-attack against it by their representatives. However Americans’ representatives so far refuse to identify much less counter-attack to annihilate this remaining active domestic enemy of Americans: Salafi-Shiite Jihadis.
[The situation has changed somewhat since this post was started in draft on 30 December 2019]:
Americans’ representatives have conducted punitive expeditions against nests of kinetic Jihadis but they have refused to attack Jihadis’ seeders, seeds, and seed beds: mullahs, hegemonic ideology, and madrassas. Needless to say, Americans are furious with their representatives for electing to not protect them, especially when every means of doing so — diplomatic, financial, war-fighting — lies to their hands in abundant supply and easy reach.
There is no reason on God’s Green Earth why Americans should be jerked around by barbarians bent on brutalizing them for personal and ideological (they say theological) enjoyment. Mullahs, their hegemonic ideology and madrassas . . . annihilate them. Americans’ representatives, US IC/FPE operators, and Deep State and Administrative State officials are protecting mullahs along with their hegemonic ideology and madrassas.
This is why VDH senses and anticipates that Americans in 2020 are relishing pay-back time against their representatives and self-appointing, unelected curators of Americans’ affairs.
Why do Americans’ representatives and soi-disant unchallengeable and unelected officials refuse to recognize the Salafi-Shiite Jihad as a clear and present global and domestic danger to Americans’ and America’s sovereign freedom much less attack said Salafi-Shiite Jihad to extirpate it? Two reasons:
1- They agree with Salafi-Shiite Jihadis that Americans and America are worthy only of death.
2- They are afraid of Salafi-Shiite Jihadis.
In other words, self-loathing and cowardice among Americans’ elected representatives and unelected officials account for their refusal to preserve, protect, support, and defend Americans and their sovereign nation, The United States of America, against the Salafi-Shiite Jihad.
Another name for the Salafi-Shiite Jihad is Arab/Pan-African Imperialism, a name I coined shortly after the air assault of 11 September 2001 on US assets by that head of Americans’ Hydra-like domestic enemy. I have mentioned Arab/Pan-African Imperialism again and again as the chief contemporary threat to Americans’ and American sovereign freedom because it is not faced and, by Americans’ representatives and so-called officials, is even invited and empowered to go rampant as a domestic enemy of Americans and America.
I remain convinced:
(1) that Arab/Pan-African Imperialism remains the most accurate and comprehensive name for the most dangerous phenomenon Americans experience — because their representatives and officials wittingly abet it — and
(2) that Americans should compel their representatives and officials to face and annihilate Arab/Pan-African Imperialism.
The name is redolent with fragrances of race, geography, history, religion, and struggle. How does a little people, a silly people, greedy, barbarous, and cruel essay to rule the world by visiting death and destruction upon all and sundry, calling that The Glory of God? Barack Obama, John Brennan and the like submit to that infantilizing then demand respect? How does a tempestuous people, promiscuous, speedily violent, deceitful, never having invented the wheel, claim that the world owes them homage and deference, especially if they are Moslem? Women of any race (!) submit to that insanity then demand respect?
The phenomenon is accurately named Arab/Pan-African Imperialism. It is a species of cupidity and even more of stupidity.
David R. Graham comments at Power Line Blog:
Putin, Modi, Trump, all Sissi, and Abe should agree an outcome for MENA then make it happen.
PaulStPaul to David R. Graham
And can another friend in the ME be added? Netanyahu?
And can we decide which side we believe Erdogan is on?
David R. Graham PaulStPaul • a few seconds ago
Very salient questions. I have tried to think them through and came out as follows.
Israel is a friend but not a Tier 1 factor outside the ME. Important in finance and trade many places, hard at it in spy craft everywhere, but for Israel, which is unobjectionable, and not for inter-nation structure-building and maintenance. Israel is not seen as a general actor because she is not one. Egypt is a general player, and going all the way back to Biblical times. Alexander saw Egypt’s global-wide geo-strategic potency, as did Napoleon and Nelson years later. Israel has no such geo-strategic strategic potency, which is why she has to arm and train unceasingly for war, rather like Poland, a doormat between two geo-strategic prizes and prize fighters. Some years ago Israel even had to repair to Egypt — as later did Jesus’ parents, recapitulating that first descent into Egypt — for existential reasons, for protection.
Crusaders also found Israel difficult to hold and defend and not worth the cost, ultimately. The reason is the land itself. It just is not geo-strategically Tier 1 important, no matter who resides on it, in it. The next important strategic geography outside Egypt is Baghdad, as once famous Talmudic and Mutazalite schools at that location indicated. Then Damascus, which is what today’s hubbub in Syria is about.
Erdogan is an easy answer: he is on the side of the Moslem Brotherhood, and for the moment, MB, as are Salafis generally, is aligned with the Ayatollahs at Qom, which makes Erdogan aligned with the Ayatollahs at Qom, for the moment (!). This is why Obama was buddies with Erdogan: they are loyal to the same miscreants: Salafis and Shiites, who are in alliance of convenience, for the moment.
Ultimately, these conflicts are about land and especially lands/transpo hubs with geo-strategic importance. If one studies roads and terrains on maps in, say, Syria, and one knows even a little of the local theological geography, one can predict with great accuracy who is going to be in a fight, or not, and why someone already is in a fight at a particular place.
PaulStPaul to David R. Graham
Very interesting.
Regarding Erdogan, you’ve identified his affinity with the MB. I don’t understand the cordiality which Pres. Trump displays toward Erdogan. In fact it is very concerning.
David R. Graham to PaulStPaul
I also do not understand his cordiality with Erdogan. I suspect related to NATO obligations, but really I do not know.
I trust him, however, to proceed in a manner salutary for our country’s sovereign freedom. I have not been able to say that about a POTUS since I felt that way about JFK.
His interview, with Melania, 31DEC under the covered walkway, on the way to New Years Party, somehow settled my sensibilities. I cannot explain why, but I think it mostly was the way Melania looked at him and noticed subtleties unfolding about her.
I am in the habit of estimating men by the loyalty of their closest women, and PDJT has that from all three wives plus his daughters. When a woman or girl feels safe next to her husband or father, that tells me the husband or father is a reliable protector, a man in the true sense of the word and role. If she trusts him, I do.
Just one of the ways my epistemological faculties roll.
Petraeus puts too much stock in interagency/deep state making the call. It was a leadership call. Bill Knudsen: A committee is a group of people who individually can get nothing done and together decide nothing can be done.
Still, Peaches is not playing the schmuck.
His estimate of the importance of eliminating Soleimani, to include comparing to UBL and Baghdadi, is accurate. UBL and Baghdadi were non-state actors even though supported by Qatar, Turkey, Syria, Saud, and Iran. Soleimani was a state actor.
The Iranians have no options they cannot expect to result in losing their infrastructure, all of it, to what for US Armed Forces would be a day’s work.
Expect now infighting among Iraqis loyal to Iran (Ministry of Interior + others), a minority of Iraqis, and Iraqis, to include Shiites, favoring alliance with USA, the large majority of Iraqis, especially now that, with Soleimani gone, they sense USA/Trump has their back.
Soleimani was arrogant with Iraqi government officials. His sway was such that he was accustomed, literally, to calling and charing meetings of top-most Iraqi government officials, to include PM and President. Soleimani ordered these officials about as if they were his functionaries. Many of them resented that but felt powerless to resist.
With Soleimani gone and sight of USA/Trump courage and resolve (DO NOT HURT AMERICANS!), those officials, especially Iraqi Army and its SOF professionals (CTS) are going to clean Iran out of the Iraqi government. The trend line is to that effect. Meanwhile, expect fireworks, which is normal and unavoidable.
jaytrain
Do not let up : Nasrallah is next. Which should give Assad pause to be part of the Shia Crescent.
David R. Graham to jaytrain
US/EU foreign policy establishment has operated from fear for decades. Don’t annoy the pigs. We know they are pigs, but don’t annoy them and maybe they will leave most of us alone. This is not a patriotic posture.
Nasrallah makes an excellent Tier I target. So does Iranian infrastructure.
For long-term effect, the target, for annihilation, should be the seeds of Islamic barbarism, its seeders, and its seed beds. The seeds are Salafi/Asharite-Shiite ideology and so-called jurisprudence. To annihilate those: form institutes for Text Criticism of the Koran. The seeders are the mullahs. To annihilate those: lay on fires. The seed beds are the mullahs’ madrassas. To annihilate them: lay on fires and have speaks with Qataris and Saudis, without chairs, regarding their financing habits. In other words, cancel fear and do what is right.
Joan to David R. Graham
Jay Smith is an American evangelist and polemicist addressing Islam in London. He has been at Hyde Park Speakers’ Corner for several decades. His Wikipedia gives his credentials, but is thin on his real work which is using Higher Criticism to exam Islam, the Koran and Mohammed, with devastating results. His work is precisely targeted at the Muslims in Britain; he regularly debates them. You can find his lectures and debates on YouTube. He asserts that this us what will eventually bring down Islam.
Another scholar/YouTuber is David Woods who successfully sued Dearborn PD for violating his 1st Amendment rights for street evangelizing at an Arab Street Fair. He’s got guts and humor. Another topic found on YouTube is “why I left Islam;” many videos available.
Your recommendations are exactly on the mark. Islamist be debunked and its seed money cut off.
Fires on mullahs.
Fires on madrassas.
Text Criticism of the Koran.
That is the way to annihilate
the Salafi-Shiite Jihad.
When you perform an activity (kriya) as an offering to the Lord, your good, the higher good, and the highest good (swartha, parartha, and paramartha) — all become one. First, I and you become we. Next, we and He become unified. The individual soul (the ‘I’ or jiva) should accomplish identity first with the creation (prakriti or ‘you’) and then with the Supreme Spirit (He or Paramatma). This journey is the significance of chanting the mantra Om Tat Sat. Today, yesterday and tomorrow, Om Tat Sat, is, was, and will be. ‘He’ and ‘I’ and the spiritual practice (sadhana) is also always there. Just as the sun is inseparable and is never apart from its rays, under no circumstances should any aspirant be without their spiritual practice. It is only when spiritual aspirants adhere to their spiritual disciplines in such an incessant manner that they can be said to be one with Om.
Sathya Sai Baba – Prema Vahini, Chapter 1 / Daily Email, Sai Inspires: Subscription
Βασιλεία του Θεού
Update 1: VDH: Why Trump Will Win Again in 2020
Update 2: John Hinderaker: Treasonous, Or Just Stupid?
I commented:
Not inconsequential that discussion/awareness is unfolding to the effect that Democrats/Media Adjuncts are traitors/domestic terrorists straight up in the plainly legal sense. PDJT gets them to self-expose, but they have been there working their treasonable/terrorist wiles for decades. This puts RINOs and JINOs between the proverbial rock and a hard place.
Update 3: Richard Fernandez: Soleimani was the man, the Islamic Republic was the regime that no one was supposed to anger lest they turn their baleful glare on us instead of passing by to kill someone else
Update 4: Arab/Pan-African Imperialists also agree with the Democrats on guns, and for the same reason. The difference now — and it makes a difference — is that while Americans, even at the leader level, have faced, measured, and grasped that Euro-American Socialists and ChiComs are their enemies, Americans, especially at the leader level, have not — yet — faced, much less measured and grasped, that Arab/Pan-African Imperialists, aka Moslem Brotherhood, Salafi-Shiite Jihadis, are their enemies.
Update 5: Omar is a spear tip of the Arab/Pan-African Imperialist movement welcomed into USA and sponsored by the Clintons, the Biushes, the Obamas, and their courtiers. Her success penetrating as far as she has the American system measures the Clinton/Bush/Obama/courtiers’ success transforming America towards an Arab/Pan-African chaos floating islands of self-protecting Euro-American sadists.
Reynolds points out occasionally that Ds and RINOs launched the Russia collusion hoax to cover for far worse things they were up to for many years previously. I think the far worse bit can be specified at least this much: aiding and abetting The Moslem Brotherhood’s hegemonic intentions towards Americans and America. Omar’s penetration of USA’s representative system illuminates how far worse are the far worse things Ds, RINOs, and their appointees have been up to by way of subverting the interests of Americans and America in favor of hegemonic Arab/Pan-African Imperialism.
It was the potential for DJT as PDJT to expose these far worse things, specifically in re The Moslem Brotherhood and its Shiite ally, which drove/drives Ds/RINOs to extirpate not only PDJT but also his fellow Americans by any means possible.
Update 6: Well, the last sentence touches the gist of it: hostility to Christian and Jewish faiths, which means, practically and legally, to Christians and Jews. That hostility is silly and counter-productive, but it is real. And it has two sources: Leftism (Communists, Fascists, Anarchists) and Arab/Pan-African Imperialism (Salafi-Shiite Jihadis, especially The Moslem Brotherhood). The McSally response to this hostility is appropriate and effective. Soon Americans will be applying it to their so-called judges.
Update 7: Dan Westrop: DHS Approves $100K Grant Of Taxpayers’ Money To CAIR
My comment:
All those groups named are Moslem Brotherhood fronts. This accommodation of an enemy internal and external started during Carter and was heavily pushed by Bushes, especially GW, by deeming the Moslem Brotherhood to be moderate Muslims. Obama was emplaced by CIA and Moslem Brotherhood.
Moslem Brotherhood, a Salafi predecessor and mentor of AQ, ISIS, al Shabbab, etc., itself is a main vector of a phenomenon justly named as Arab/Pan-African Imperialism. These are political hegemons operating behind the guise of religion, Islam specifically. Neither elected nor appointed officials of the USG are facing much less addressing the hegemon-intending presence among Americans of Arab/Pan-African Imperialism.
It has been thought that phenomenon comprises personalities and races too puny to matter to the American system. That lethal miscalculation by USG and many Americans drives more from fear than it does from ratiocination.
Update 8: Arabs Are Losing Faith In Religious Parties And Leaders
Update 9: Lee Smith: Iran and America Are Suddenly Both Naked
Update 10: Tom Tancredo Discusses Mexican Cartel and Terrorist Alliances, Nuking Mecca
Update 11: Angelo M. Codevilla: Abolish The CIA
Related: Very weak tea from Austin Bay
Update 12: Robert Spencer: 120 Members of Congress Send Letters of Support to Hamas-Linked Group
Update 13: Roger Moorhouse: The war that saved Europe from Communism
Update 14: Robert Spencer: Muslim leader calls for removal of parts of Qur’an that ‘promote terrorism,’ Muslim cleric calls for his beheading