RAMANAM
In the Name of The Father, and of The Son and of The Holy Spirit, Amen.

Countrymen,

At Power Line I commented:

“… lawless, dishonest, and unethical” … but not impeachable? Why, in the name of all that’s gracious, not? Polls appear to reflect a huge aquifer of yearning in the people for moral courage in their servants.

At Instapundit I commented:

There is a running record, since May 2014, of articles in re Benghazi and Libya here.

IMO Benghazi is the jugular of this regime, the globalist pretensions of the Euro-American ruling class and their Hillary Klepton. A non-ruling class Congress would have impeached this regime far and wide long since. The list of relevant charges would challenge even Dan Rather’s word processor to keep up recording them.

At Power Line I commented:

“… arrogance, dishonesty and hatred ….” And not impeachable? I should think the list of charges would roll trippingly off the tongue like water over a great falls, no? You guys have the contacts, why are you not talking impeachment? Leadership?

– – – – – – – – –

The global governance crowd hates national sovereignty, especially US national sovereignty.  Therefore, that is precisely the weapon to use against them.  US national sovereignty comprises three elements: the Land Herself, Her Families and Her Constitution.  Let all three descend upon the global governance crowd like tons of feathers.  Bury the traitors in it.

On the dialectics of US national sovereignty and US nation security, see here.

On the subject of US grand national strategic goal, strategy and tactics, see here and here.

Update 1: Richard Fernandez: That Old Time Religion

Update 2: A correspondent of Scott Johnson’s at Power Line treats of an unnoticed aspect of the Hillary Clinton private email server affront.  I commented:

Scott, your correspondent assumes Hillary recognizes a country to secure. She does not. That’s the point of the entire world governance/globalist elite, isn’t it?: there is no national sovereignty, only personal viability in a global community.  Get yours, they say to themselves.

Your correspondent’s point works in a law-based system of national sovereignty. But this now is a rules-based system of global governance by hyper-privileged elites — they attend the same cocktail parties everywhere on the globe — in their private global community.  So they think. They can do as they wish because there is no authority superior to themselves, no nation deserving much less demanding security.

Their thinking — global governance (by themselves alone, because they mean so well), no national sovereignty — drives the Arab/Pa-African invasion of Europe, the Indo-Chinese/Pan-South American invasion of North America and such as the Obergefell-vs-Hodges decision. We make the rules, you obey them, and we don’t want or have national sovereignties obstructing our wishes for having lots of fun for ourselves while we talk about doing lots of good for you others.

If your correspondent wants to help, ask him or her to preach the reality of USA national sovereignty and all it implies in whatever is their orbit. These elegant globalists wield great power, as is known, but their foundation remains a cloud, a dream. Their power derives from their generation of deluding fictions. Ask your correspondent to make that point in his or her circle of contacts, to say again and again what is true, that national sovereignty is here to stay and will not be swept away.

Update 3: Scott Johnson at Power Line quotes and comments thereon a law-learned correspondent in re incalculable damage done by Hillary Clinton to US national security.  All of which is true, of course, but I saw another facet in the subject and commented as follows:

Scott, your correspondent assumes Hillary recognizes a country to secure. She does not. That’s the point of the entire world governance/globalist elite, isn’t it?: there is no national sovereignty, only personal viability in a global community. Get yours, they say to themselves.

Your correspondent’s point works in a law-based system of national sovereignty. But this now is a rules-based system of global governance by hyper-privileged elites — they attend the same cocktail parties everywhere on the globe — in their private global community. So they think. They can do as they wish because there is no authority superior to themselves, no nation deserving much less demanding security.

Their thinking — global governance (by themselves alone, because they mean so well), no national sovereignty — drives the Arab/Pan-African invasion of Europe, the Indo-Chinese/Pan-South American invasion of North America and such as the Obergefell-vs-Hodges decision. We make the rules, you obey them, and we don’t want or have national sovereignties obstructing our wishes for having lots of fun for ourselves while we talk about doing lots of good for you others.

If your correspondent wants to help, ask him or her to preach the reality of USA national sovereignty and all it implies in whatever is their orbit. These elegant globalists wield great power, as is known, but their foundation remains a cloud, a dream. Their power derives from their generation of deluding fictions. Ask your correspondent to make that point in his or her circle of contacts, to say again and again what is true, that national sovereignty is here to stay and will not be swept away.

Related: Glenn Reynolds quotes, approvingly, a jerk at Walter Russell Mead’s American Interest moaning that Hungary’s new emergency laws, to address invasion of that country by the Middle Eastern horde, trample on several basic liberal values.  Reynolds concurred in this language: I’m afraid so.  Against which I commented, Tut.  To the jerk at American Interest I commented:

… laws that trample on several basic liberal values ….

No, you smug, fat, safely-padded, hand-wringing jackwagon, it’s not about liberal values, it’s about national and cultural sovereignty. Trying to make a sovereignty issue a values issue is classic fasco-commie subversion by misdirection. I knew American-Interest is sanctimonious fasco-commie, but this really self-exposes these muckers of weaponized empathy.

Update 4: Jonah Goldberg: The Rise Of House Clinton

Update 5: Benghazi Smoking Gun Email Unmasks Hillary Clinton, also here

Update 6: ISIL/ISIS in Libya

Update 7: David Bernstein: ‘Power Wars:’ Was [The Fraud] Administration National Security Policy Lawless?

Update 8: US Department of State is a criminal conspiracy.

 

AMDG – VICTORY