National Sovereignty And Domestic Liberty

Chaitanya Jyothi Museum Opening, 2000

RAMANAM
In the Name of The Father, and of The Son and of The Holy Spirit, Amen.

Countrymen,

ORBIS NON SUFFICIT
SOLUS DEUS SUFFICIT

Through the centuries, voting citizens of the United States have consistently supported strong national sovereignty (the conservative agenda) and strong domestic liberty (the libertarian agenda). There is no reason to anticipate that the resolve of voting citizens of the United States in these particulars will alter either now or in the future.

For confirmation of this assertion, see: David Von Drehle.

When one follows the logic of these observations, which are accurate, one sees that the 11SEP01 Commission gave President Bush the evidence and therefore the justification for asking Congress to declare war on al Quaeda and its supporting intellectual, moral and political structures: Caliphism, AKA “Islamic fundamentalism” or “Islamist extremism.”

Religion has nothing to do with this. Caliphism is imperialism, plain and simple, sourced in the jealously guarded misogynist/homosexual culture of Arabia and Africa.

Update 1: Richard Fernandez: That Old Time Religion

Update 2: Scott Johnson at Power Line quotes and comments thereon a law-learned correspondent in re incalculable damage done by Hillary Clinton to US national security. All of which is true, of course, but I saw another facet in the subject and commented as follows:

Scott, your correspondent assumes Hillary recognizes a country to secure. She does not. That’s the point of the entire world governance/globalist elite, isn’t it?: there is no national sovereignty, only personal viability in a global community. Get yours, they say to themselves.

Your correspondent’s point works in a law-based system of national sovereignty. But this now is a rules-based system of global governance by hyper-privileged elites — they attend the same cocktail parties everywhere on the globe — in their private global community. So they think. They can do as they wish because there is no authority superior to themselves, no nation deserving much less demanding security.

Their thinking — global governance (by themselves alone, because they mean so well), no national sovereignty — drives the Arab/Pan-African invasion of Europe, the Indo-Chinese/Pan-South American invasion of North America and such as the Obergefell-vs-Hodges decision. We make the rules, you obey them, and we don’t want or have national sovereignties obstructing our wishes for having lots of fun for ourselves while we talk about doing lots of good for you others.

If your correspondent wants to help, ask him or her to preach the reality of USA national sovereignty and all it implies in whatever is their orbit. These elegant globalists wield great power, as is known, but their foundation remains a cloud, a dream. Their power derives from their generation of deluding fictions. Ask your correspondent to make that point in his or her circle of contacts, to say again and again what is true, that national sovereignty is here to stay and will not be swept away.

Related: Glenn Reynolds quotes, approvingly, a jerk at Walter Russell Mead’s American Interest moaning that Hungary’s new emergency laws, to address invasion of that country by the Middle Eastern horde, trample on several basic liberal values. Reynolds concurred in this language: I’m afraid so. Against which I commented, Tut. To the jerk at American Interest I commented:

… laws that trample on several basic liberal values ….

No, you smug, fat, safely-padded, hand-wringing jackwagon, it’s not about liberal values, it’s about national and cultural sovereignty. Trying to make a sovereignty issue a values issue is classic fasco-commie subversion by misdirection. I knew American-Interest is sanctimonious fasco-commie, but this really self-exposes the muckers.

Update 3: Jonah Goldberg: The Wisdom And Folly In Albert Jay Nock’s Anti-Statism

Update 4: Rush Limbaugh on what’s actually happening

Update 5: This statement by a Trump advisor is accurate:

On Monday’s Breitbart News Daily, Donald Trump’s Senior Policy Adviser Stephen Miller said this election represents “binary choice” that boils down to a decision of “nation-state versus globalism.”

Also this is true: two globalist cartels are extant, temporarily allied: Secular oligarchs and Salafist Jihadists. Both are puritanical hegemons. Puritanism is the bane of humanity. It is a mental weakness driving an adamantine morality, which is to say, conjuring the Devil.

Update 6: I read this and try to think of something meaningful to write. Nothing is there, except there being nothing there. So I have to write, nothing is there. Which is actually something (nothing) not discussable. Perhaps I approach Samadhi.

I do think this: that ValJar is setting up Hillary for Michelle and ValJar. Hillary’s email was unmasked by the White House. All know who that is. And the only reason she would even bother is, she has no intention of leaving the White House until, as she has said, she turns the lights out there. I assume she means in order to move to another house, one with a portfolio having global jurisdiction.

She has said over and again, So much remains to be done. And means it for sure. Namely, to abolish USA national sovereignty and establish global governance by unelected technocrats, wise-guys. She shares that goal with very many high and mighty all over the globe and especially in USA (both R&D) and EU.

Power Line team and commentators speak nary a word about this secular globalist phenomenon, this barely concealed and eagerly anticipated agitation for sedition. John’s post on H1B sub-free labor a while back came closest, I think, to unmasking the phenomenon. Illegal immigration is noted, but not for what it is: sedition of USA and all other national sovereignties. One should be a conservative globalist, working an end to nation states, only on conservative principles rather than leftie ones, I guess. Exegeting the political philosophy inside that posture would make a dandy doctoral thesis. Maybe even a great stump speech.

Update 7: Comey, as a person and official, makes me feel comfortable. I sense some titanic struggle is occurring just under the veneer of D.C.’s glittering facade.

It feels like some estimable chunk of officialdom wants to help keep the USA as a functioning, independent nation state while an essentially rabble of misanthropes wants to help each other hide the fact from voters — all voters — that they want to govern (they mean rule, but they do chaos) a full globe on which North America is merely a region — and they want that engineered into sub-regional urban hives centrally controlled from their global bureaucratic hub.

In that picture I see Comey trying to help keep the USA as a functioning, independent nation state. He looks to me like a fighter pilot with legal training. An estimable combination.

I think the way you protect people is you grow their independence.

Update 8: At trial is national sovereignty. Very much so.

Update 9: The low-skilled and modestly-skilled workforce is supplied by H1b here and its comparable in Europe. Legal and above board. (Avoiding for the nounce the question of meet, right and salutary.) Although even those legal paths, here and in Europe, are merely a bridge to massive automation.

So the illegal influx, fostered by globalists in addition to H1b, is not about pumping the work force. And Murray’s Q about hiring Euro youth to fill the work force is an oblivious non sequitur.

Why, then, do globalists want an illegal influx? It doesn’t benefit them. It isn’t meant to. Why, then? I’m not sure. I don’t think like they think. It seems to me, I would say, that globalists are a seething brew of one part megalomania and one part cussedness: giddy control freaks wrapped in spiteful hedonism. Basically, your modern iteration of the ever-petulant anti-Christian. And they are angry at their parents.

Update 10: The notion that refugees and immigrants should be admitted to a sovereign nation without caveat or demurrer is conjured by two essentials of Liberation Theology, itself a successful KGB subversion operation: precarity and what lately is called weaponized empathy (classically: scrupulosity). Both are perversions of Christian doctrine (aka experience) with the end in view of disabling Christian civilization by eliminating citizens’ ability to tell truth from fiction and thereby defend themselves. Moslems, Salafist and Shiite, have taken advantage of the KGB’s success removing from so many Europeans and Americans their ability to discern what is in their interest. Socialists have gone insane from self-induced terror upon learning that more than a few Europeans and Americans retain the ability to think clearly enough to defend themselves. The answer, as always, is hearty laughter.

Update 11: The Pope is with the Deep State, hard left and here

Update 12: But: Who Killed The Left?

Glenn Reynolds: Having won all the battles, the Left is losing the culture war.

Richard Fernandez: Because, God.

Update 13: Conservatives Need A Remedial Course In Sovereignty

Update 14: Why Trump’s U.N. Speech Was A Triumph

Update 15: Foreign Policy magazine gnashes her teeth, good: Brazil’s Love Affair With Diplomacy Is Dead

AUM NAMAH SHIVAYA