As Is The Feeling,
So Is The Result.
Background Forces
Kurt Schlichter on the difference between kinetic and information warfare: This Leftist Tantrum Is an Information Operation and Trump Is Winning It
Certain intending oligarchs of religion, academe, medicine, law, military, and industry have launched a show of force against The Constitution Of The United States of America. Their intent is to demonstrate that Americans are unable and unwilling to support and defend their nation’s Constitution and thus themselves. They expect this demonstration to demoralize Americans to the point of abjuring their personal and national freedom and sovereignty.
A unitary global order — rules-based, as they say, with them and their designees, so-called experts, making the rules — is their geo-political objective. Their economic objective is unending prosperity for themselves and unending obeisance from their customers, who are disposable in oligarchs’ accounting. Maintaining their addictions to drugs, promiscuity, travel, and acclaim within their circle of oligarchs is oligarchs’ personal objective.
This is an old dream, never fulfilled, but always alluring to the weak.
Overall, this situation is about force and the use thereof. It is not in the first instance about right and wrong, legal and illegal, good and bad. It is about freedom and about law protecting freedom equally among all citizens regardless of race, status, creed, or ability. Thus, our challenge today is about force — specifically, law enforcement — since force makes the law legal.
In theological analysis, force, right, law, and good are one and the same. As force increases, right, law, and good increase. As force decreases, right, law, and good decrease. The wrongness of wrong it its weakness, not its existence. The illegal-ness of illegality, of crime, is its self-doubt, not its operation. The badness of bad is its cowardice, not its presence.
Intending oligarchs have ordered their minions to carve away portions of The United States Of America, actual geographies, dirt, water, air, and all, where The Constitution Of The United States Of America is neither in force nor enforced. These portions now comprise a significant amount of land, water, and air space. In some respects they comprise entire states nullifying The Constitution Of The United States Of America and declaring an area or an entire state (e.g., California) a nation state, announcing or implying that they mean a sovereign nation state.
Where equal protection of the law under The Constitution Of The United States Of America does not obtain, The United States Of America does not obtain.
Such a condition is termed an insurrection. In 1807, the US Congress passed and the US President signed The Insurrection Act. The Act has been invoked by US Presidents some twenty times since its passage, first by President Jefferson, a Democrat, most recently, in 1992, by President Bush, a Republican. Twelve of those twenty invocations, over half of them, occurred during the 20th Century. Nine of those twelve were by Democrats, three were by Republicans.
The first 20th Century President to invoke The Insurrection Act was Woodrow Wilson, a Democrat.
The Insurrection Act has been invoked six time (30% of the total of times) without state request. Presidents who did that were: Grant, twice, Eisenhower, once, and Kennedy, thrice.
Presidents who invoked The Act the most times were Kennedy, three, and Johnson, four, both Democrats. Presidents Grant and Bush The Elder, both Republicans, invoked The Act twice each.
The Insurrection Act has been modified twice. Once, recently, it was amended to permit military intervention without state consent, but quickly, that amendment was repealed.
Measured by frequency of invocation of The Insurrection Act, the 20th Century was a time of tumult inside The United States Of America. More so than was the 19th Century, at the start of which The Act was propounded, even counting The Civil War Between The States!
At 9-3 Democrats-Republicans during the 20th Century, this data point says that, at least during the 20th Century, The United States Of America goes tumultuous under Democrats more than she does under Republicans.
How much of that can be laid to foreign meddling, to foreign nation states conjuring and supporting proxies inside The United States Of America, to bring her to confusion, rendering her unable to self-defend?
Probably most of it, if one counts the domestic-and foreign-born pusillanimity of clergy, malice of academics, and careerism of lawyers and senior military officers large majorities of whom identify, over many decades, as Democrats and/or enjoy illegitimate beneficences of domestic and foreign origin.
In any case, your chances of having a general upset were three times greater from Democratic Party office holders than from Republican Party ones during the 20th Century. The record on Insurrection Act invocations speaks for itself.
This Is All A Matter Of Force
Kurt Schlichter on the difference between kinetic and information warfare: This Leftist Tantrum Is an Information Operation and Trump Is Winning It
Military force is justified and legal where police force is unable and/or unwilling to maintain constitutional protections for all citizens equally.
The decision point is the operational efficacy of The Constitution Of The United States on land, water, and in air belonging to The United States Of America. Ordinarily, police force is applied to enforce that efficacy so that military force is unneeded for that purpose. Military force is not designed as police force. Military force necessarily exceeds police force qua force by orders of magnitude because its facing is towards portending aggression by a nation state or by an aggressive force sponsored by a nation state.
A state-sponsored force is a proxy for a nation state and, as such, its operations are the nation state sponsoring it.
When police force is unable or unwilling to maintain constitutional protections for all citizens equally, invocation of The Insurrection Act is justified and required.
As originally, and until recently, contemplated, The Insurrection Act is used to supply a deficiency of ability by police force to enforce The Constitution Of The United States Of America. It was assumed by nearly all Americans that said enforcement was the prius of their safety, their careers, their prosperity, their duties as citizens, and their general happiness.
Now, however, that assumption does not inform many. Its opposite does. An insufficiency of ability to enforce The Constitution Of The United States Of America, always a latency of police force, is augmented now by an insufficiency — at least — of will to enforce The Constitution Of The United States Of America in some states, counties, and municipalities belonging to The United States Of America.
Indeed, per certain intending oligarchs, there flourishes now a direct, even triumphalist will to not enforce The Constitution Of The United States Of America wherever possible. A will to nullify The Constitution Of The United States Of America grasps office holders and therefore institutions not a few throughout the land.
This is a novel situation for Americans, at least with respect to the scale of the phenomenon. Directly or indirectly, Americans are accustomed to urban political-criminal organizations forcing them to live unprotected, in some respects, by The Constitution Of The United States Of America. But that phenomenon has been mostly local and locally treatable.
Gang toughs, organized crime organizations, corrupt politicians, overbearing teachers, venal clergy . . . ho hum. Americans are adept, more or less, at dealing with such constrictors because Americans are agile and adaptive and because the constrictors were not overwhelming in scale.
Now, diminishment by constriction appears overwhelming in scale because the very stewards tasked with enforcing of The Constitution Of The United States Of America are refusing to do that, and on ideological grounds rather than on fact-based, rational ones.
This is new to Americans, this breach of trust and respect and this betrayal of fiduciary responsibility. It is breath-taking, a gut punch, and saddening to patriots, among whom previous generations had been eager and able to count almost all of their neighbors.
Their weakness for totalitarian tastes, served and cultivated as that weakness is by data-crunching and propaganda technologies as well as by Judeo-Bolshevik, Chinese, and Jihadist ideological congruences, toughs and teachers, criminals and clergy, politicians and producers — and others of an entirely different description — take to invite victorious shouting by them: This Is Our Day, Cry Havoc!
The scale of this insurrection is foreign to Americans. They are moving to contact with it, but the size, the scale of the threat is novel and intimidating and has to be absorbed to some extent, the punch rolled with so that insurrectionists do not gain their flanks while Americans organize an effective counter-attack.
It is all a matter of force. The Constitution Of The United States Of America is to be enforced equally and everywhere on land, water, and in air belonging to The United States Of America. Where local police force is unable or unwilling to do that, The Insurrection Act is legitimately and necessarily invoked.
In an absence of effective police force, military force requisite to enforcing the plenary authority of The Constitution Of The United States Of America everywhere — land, water, and air — which has been, and therefore must remain, The United States Of America must be applied.
Moreover, such enforcement is precisely the duty Presidents and Military Officers are sworn to execute.
The Use Of Force
Kurt Schlichter on the difference between kinetic and information warfare: This Leftist Tantrum Is an Information Operation and Trump Is Winning It
Insurrectionists — intending oligarchs of religion, academe, medicine, law, military, and industry — declare themselves outside the authority of The Constitution Of The United States Of America. They declare territory they or their minions occupy and persons they hold inside said territory outside the authority of The Constitution Of The United States Of America.
Numerous federal and state constitutional and statutory specifications are abridged by these declarations. Criminal intent and action have been admitted and executed by oligarchs of religion, academe, medicine, law, military, and industry. Insurrection is a crime, not a right.
The question of secession is already decided in the crucible of war. There is neither possibility nor right of secession from The United States Of America. Therefore, any declaration of secession from The United States Of America, or one bearing verisimilitude to the same, direct or indirect, is insurrection, not secession.
Living outside equal protection by The Constitution Of The United States Of America was the condition of Americans wanted, believed, and assumed but not patently declared by office holders and minions during the Obama Occupation: The Constitution Of The United States Of America is annulled by us in undeclared fiat, they said without saying it.
Thus were those office holders and minions — backed by sycophants of religion, academe, medicine, law, military, and industry — able widely to operate without constitutional reference or hinderance and with only the fleeting wraiths of image consciousness for guidance.
“We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.” So declared Barack Obama in Columbia, Missouri, on Oct. 30, 2008, on the cusp of his historic presidential election. He meant annul The Constitution Of The United States Of America, but he did not say what he meant, and he never would, nor will.
To that same condition intending oligarchs of religion, academe, medicine, law, military, and industry — operating through the Democratic Party — have declared Americans to be destined, and by their hands: annulment of The Constitution Of The United States Of America and in its stead, rule by intending oligarchs through their appointed, globe-wide, rules-making experts, their minions.
Police forces in some sovereign US domains, to include very large ones, have proven unable and/or unwilling to enforce The Constitution Of The United States Of America in their jurisdictions. Invocation of The Insurrection Act, and everything in its train — to include execution of insurrectionists — is indicated.
Roger L. Simon: Our Elites Suffer From China Envy
John Solomon: Ex-Trump adviser breaks silence on Russia probe, says Iran deal played role in false allegations
Jacob Nordangard: The Elite Technocrats Behind The Global ‘Great Reset’
As part of religions, creeds and cults may exist as branches of a tree. None should condemn them as wrong. Also, no branch should fight against another or compete with another. When that happens, the tree will be destroyed and all will end in ruin. When creeds indulge in competitive rivalry, religion is ruined and the world is destroyed. Only One exists; wise describe it in many ways (Ekam sath; viprah bahudha vadanti). Each of us may have different ideas on the nature and characteristics, form and attributes of God. One person may believe God as having qualities and form of humans. Another may believe in a God devoid of human form and signs, but yet manifesting in all embodiments. Another may believe in God as altogether formless. The real truth is, all have faith in God, in a mysterious power (sakti) that is the source, support, and sustenance of all, a power that subsumes all creation!
- Sathya Sai Baba – Vidya Vahini, Chapter 13 / Daily Email, Sai Inspires: Subscription
Βασιλεία του Θεού