Five Eyes, Reconfigured

Chaitanya Jyothi Museum Opening, 2000

RAMANAM
In nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus Sancti.  Amen.

Countrymen,

ORBIS NON SUFFICIT
SOLUS DEUS SUFFICIT

GA Douglas MacArthur
GA Douglas MacArthur

In the movie Patton, George C. Scott, playing General George S. Patton — addresses a gathering of ladies at an English village.  He announces, among other things, that England and The United States — implying English-speaking nations — are destined to rule the world.

In the movie, this was political dynamite at the time because Stalin had recently decided to oppose The Third Reich and so in Great Britain and The United States became Uncle Joe instead of a hated Soviet Commie.  Propaganda turns on a dime without any stress whatsoever.  Patton was condemned by his own countrymen for belittling Stalin’s contribution to the war effort.

But it was true.  Stalin remained a Soviet Commie reviled by his allies, who yet thought they needed him to defeat Hitler and Tojo.  (Actually, he needed them to defeat Hitler and made a feint in his east as grounds for demanding control of surrendered Japan.)  So, as part of the post-war reconfiguring of inter-nation relations, Great Britain and The United States set out to do what Patton, in the movie, predicted to the English ladies they would do: rule the world, or in other words, protect the Anglosphere by at least stalling threats to it, such as emanated from the nature of Uncle Joe Stalin.

A reasonable and predictable bit of statecraft it was, as far as it went.  It had been best to defeat Uncle Joe rather than stall him — again, as Patton and MacArthur wanted to do, and could have done — but that matter lies outside the interest of this post.

Several structures were emplaced to make the reconfiguring happen.  Bretton Woods and NATO, structures for sharing finance and war-fighting assets, respectively, were among them.  Also among them was a then-secret UKUSA Agreement, an intelligence-sharing structure details of which were published in 2010.  This Agreement evolved from The Atlantic Charter and into Five Eyes (FVEY).

Five Eyes is Anglophone.  Its members are English-speaking nations.  They share intelligence automatically as well as manually.  All kinds.  There are now second-degree, non-English-speaking nation participants, so it is said, but none of those are in the automatic portion of the system, so it is said.

I am interested neither in how Five Eyes works nor in finding out how Five Eyes works.

My interest is observing that, if Three Brothers Doctrine is valid, and especially if it is ineluctable, Five Eyes as presently configured — no matter how and no matter how the configuration operates — is noncore and superfluous to USA interests, aka grand national strategic objectives.  I will proceed taking that observation as accurate while recognizing that either one or both of its elements might fail scrutiny, although I think neither can.

The world is not Anglophone.  I grew up when it was, or, for me, was protected enough to seem so.  I miss it, I miss the protection, though I think it is not so gone as frightful propaganda has it.  I’m still here.  My family is still here.

Even within the Anglosphere, there is English-speaking and there is English-speaking.  Whole academic curricula, and their spawning institutions, as well as churches and other NGOs devote to ripping apart the Anglosphere from within.  These use English to destroy English, which is a strange, demonic posture.  The United Nations, par excellence an Anglosphere creation for self-protection, today could not stand less adamantly anti-Anglo.

But more to the salient matter, the protection of the Anglosphere envisioned and successfully executed through structures such as UKUSA Agreement, NATO, Five Eyes, and even United Nations is not working as intended.  It is failing absolutely.  It has failed absolutely.

Two hegemonic powers came knocking, one Middle Eastern, one African, and the Anglosphere threw open its door and tore down sides of its house to let them in.  Never mind why Five Eyes, NATO, etc, did this or just let it happen.  They did it, it did happen, and against their own peace and original mission.  And they ordained to protect the Middle Eastern and the African more and better than they would the Anglo, in the Anglo’s own home, which they partially tore down.

Then came a third and far greater hegemonic power, China, and again, officials meant to be manning the Anglosphere threw up the helm and drove before the gale.

This stirs, shall we say, disconsolation.

Structures created by the Anglosphere for its own protection following World War II turned on their charge, the Anglosphere, and struck it right hard and sassily.  This makes those structures invalid and disposable, or put less bluntly, noncore and superfluous.

So, and even more to the salient matter, something went back in the intelligence of the Anglosphere itself, something enormous and shapeful.  Call it the march of history, call it invasion of the pickle people, write theses about its nature and origin, ascribe it to love on a pogo stick.  I really do not care.  The Anglosphere, and especially its listening, seeing, observing structures, lost and gave up their juju.  They demolished the Anglosphere’s prestige and thereby demolished its puissance.

I think it is because the Anglosphere’s job was done, its mission accomplished.  Every thing gets old, senile, and decrepit and so must go, the sooner the better.

To me, the sight of cruel, selfish, stupid, corrupt personages handling levers of power is a sign that the levers they handle do not control events any more.  The personages and even more so the structures they administer connect no longer with reality.  The purpose for their creation remains valid and always will, but those structures no longer get the job done.

Or, that job, being done, a new and different one awaits, which I think is where we are today.

The USA needs a Five Eyes for self-protection.  But not for the/an Anglosphere.  We are not going back there.  We are going to a fresh alliance system with fresh diplomacy, finance, and war-fighting (to include intelligence) structures to execute for that self-protection.

The Three Brothers (USA, India, Russia) core-embody the fresh alliance system much as USA, Great Britain, and Canada core-embodied the previous alliance system.  And whereas the previous system had its two primary but not (originally) core participants, Australia and New Zealand, I propose the fresh alliance system has its two primary but not, at this point anyhow, core participants: Egypt and Japan.

Obviously, this is not an Anglosphere.  An Anglosphere does not even exist now.  So what do the sovereign nations of this fresh alliance structure have in common?  What unites them?  Two things: each is the chief of their culture and each is successfully multi-religious.  But for Japan, they have a third facet in common: successfully multi-racial.

Nation states are the chief actors for the drama called history.  Lesser actors abound, such as treaties, agreements, non-sovereign organizations.  But the nation state is the ultimate authority in this embodied, breathing world and interaction among nation states is the content of history.  Nor exists nor can exist authority superceding that of a nation state.  Nation states may lose or gain sovereignty in relation to other nation states, but they never lose their authority, even when they are subjugated.  This keeps globalists weeping and angry while redoubling effort. And it is their undoing.

Three elements comprise a nation state: Land, Families, and Constitution.  All three would have to concur to make the authority of a nation state cease to exist.  But such will never happen and never has happened.

Five Eyes, reconfigured, is what globalists and multiculturalists really want did they but know it: a conference of unique, strong cultures embodied as key leader, sovereign nation states.  Five of them: India, USA, Russia, Egypt, Japan.  They can make the peace because they include everyone consequential to driving both Moslem/Pan-African and Chinese hegemonic ambitions to unconditional surrender.  In other words, these five have the cultural strengths antecedent to destroying the hegemonies of those pathological cultures.

Moreover, Five Eyes, reconfigured, is the complete structure for interaction among these five and not only the intelligence-sharing component.  Five Eyes is a plenary diplomacy, finance, communications, and war-fighting alliance.  No need to part things out.  Put everything in one house so everyone knows where it is and can go there to conduct business.

Now, I can anticipate, so far, five objections:

1- Five Eyes, reconfigured, is global governance.  You are giving Chamber of Commerce, Ivy League, Brookings, and UN what they want by another name: world-wide rule by experts not subject to consent by the ruled.

Answer: No.  Five nations, each sovereign, set this up . . . and can tear it up.  Also, because five powers and not one vivify it, Five Eyes cannot rule but it can be an instrument to guide, even order, and should be and be able to do because of the cultural authorities and individual sovereignties of the five nation states running it.

2- Totally delusional, ignorant of world and cultural dynamics, not to mention human nature, not even the slightest chance of even starting down that path much less discovering its trailhead . . . because there is none, dummy, maybe even malicious dummy!

Answer: Perhaps.  Perhaps not.  What have you got to lose, your rice bowl?  And that is more important than world peace, or more to the point, being a man?

3- None of those nations is going to have the least bit of trust in any other of them, and without mutual trust, nothing happens.  You are asking, in effect, that Alice play croquet using a live hedgehog for a ball and a live flamingo for a mallet.  You want accomplishment from a meta-random system, you malignant Queen of Hearts.

Answer: Two points: (1) We (leader nations, those of ancient authority able to maintain their sovereignty) stand together or hang separately.  (2) Each of these five nations has the same enemies: the Moslem Jihad and China (Socialism writ large).  In other words, while this reconfiguration of Five Eyes may look like an irrational, meta-random system, a mixing of self-absorbed un-mixables, it is not.  Deep rationalities not only drive these five nations together but also hold them together.

4- No European nations are included.  Europe is our oldest and closest ally.  You are crazy!

Answer: Europe is Moslem Lebensraum.  Official Europe, to include Great Britain and her GCHQ, cheats the USA while disparaging her and welcoming their own executioners.  A thoroughly unhealthy relationship, one thoroughly to be spurned.  The nations of the Intermarium are another matter, ancient allies (Poland) and newer ones (Czech Republic, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Romania, Bulgaria, Hungary, Baltics).  Americans sympathize with anyone who is beaten up, unless they have been beating up others.

5- Putin and pals pine for the glories of The Soviet Union.  You want to give them everything, just like that, for free?!?!?  Idiot!

Answer: Putin and pals pine for the glories of Mother Russia and the strategic rationality of Catherine the Great.  In addition, Russia is Europe, the now-and-future reasonable, aka Christian, part of it.  USA should offer to help protect Russia from the EuroJihad.


Βασιλεία του Θεού
Kingdom of God

Update 1: Pat Buchanan: How the War Party Lost the Middle East

Update 2: GEN (RET) B. B. Bell: Military Generals And Globalism – And Response

Update 3: Egyptian Islamists Fight Back on Screen

Update 4: Angelo M. Codevilla:

European Defense

Desperate Embrace At Europe’s Core

Related: German Defense Chief: Unleash NATO on Opponents of “World Order”
Related: German Defense Minister Reinforces Trump’s Reservations On NATO

Update 5: Glenn Reynolds: Abolish the Ivy League.  I commented:

The Ivy League is church-made. Abolish the churches to abolish the Ivy League.  Not so hard to do. Find them by law as political fronts.  The churches, I mean.

The Church is exclusive, not inclusive.  That fact will abolish the Ivy League, all on its own, not just talk about abolishing it.  “Have no God beside me.”  You do not get more exclusive than that.  Make that point, miracles will happen.

Update 6: Angelo Codevilla on GA Douglas MacArthur: The Tipping Point (PDF)

Update 7: DNC Grassroots Victory Fund Bankrolled by 13 Wealthy LiberalsAUM NAMAH SHIVAYA

Update 8: Roger Moorhouse: The war that saved Europe from Communism

Update 9: Andrew Roberts: The Wall Street Journal: “It’s Time To Revive The Anglosphere”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *