RAMANAM
In the Name of The Father, and of The Son and of The Holy Spirit, Amen.
Countrymen,
ORBIS NON SUFFICIT
SOLUS DEUS SUFFICIT
… his actions form no discernible pattern.
There are some patterns:
1- Insults to American patriots for being patriotic.
Commenter Cannoneer No 4 put it this way in re Violent Hillary: She pretty much hates Americans who have nuts to knee. Nutless Americans are her constituency. For the nutted, she is the ex-wife from Hell.
2- Running interference and all manner of support overseas and domestically for Salafist (Moslem Brotherhood) and Shiite (Iranian Ayatollahs) hegemons.
3- Federal doles in money or in kind to any anti-Christian cause and any secular crony hegemon’s social-financial elevation and political command and control.
4- Financial, legal, propaganda, etc., squeeze, even if only to foster mental self-censoring, on any expression of creativity, freedom, fun for fun’s sake by American patriots.
5- Absolute mutual support with the US Deep State (CIA and some other elements of the IC).
6- Diplomatic, financial and military undoing of any multi-national structures or agreements that obstruct Salafist, Iranian or secular cronies’ hegemonic or anti-Christian goals. For example: Taliban, ISIS, Gaddafi, al Sisi, Netanyahu, Hashemites, all of whom oppose Moslem Brotherhood, Iran and US corporate and academic hegemons.
7- Basically, a very long-cultured wise-guy, smart-ass anti-Christian son of Christianity’s cultured despisers (Schleiermacher’s phrase), reared by the US Deep State, recruited by Salafist (MB) and Shiite plotters — who have tribal claims on him and long co-mingle with said Deep State — and sent forth by said plotters and despisers to spread confusion, chaos and crises they can exploit to their benefit, however they wish to define that.
Good and proper questions to ponder. Yes. My initial and very general answer is: she would focus on deploying executive authority to harm men both specifically and generally, both domestically and overseas. Especially Christian, normal (reproductively) men and men not loyal to The Moslem Brotherhood.
Her posture and words upon the demise of Gaddafi — We got him! — her ways with USSS bodyguards, plus her lesbianism incline me to this preliminary answer. US military units she would set on murderous op tempos across the globe and she would leave dangling any units which got isolated or otherwise in trouble (remember Mogadishu, Benghazi).
Were she able, she would scale above even the German 6th Army’s experience at Stalingrad. Because she fears men and most military men are Christians and normal, regardless of race. Hillary Clinton is afraid of men. She is violent.
Paul looks hollowed out (also here), not the man he was at Graduation at West Point years ago (2001).
But he is tracking true to form for Talmudic and some other Neo-Cons. They are shilling for Hillary or overtly supporting her. The list is very long and heavy. It includes a non-Talmudic writer here at Power Line and two Talmudic ones. Also includes Goldberg, Kristol, Podhoretz, Schindler, Neo Neo-Con. Worth remembering, also, that Neo-Cons descend from Scoop Jackson, a Democrat, so their and their co-religionists’ loyalty to Hillary is not unexpected.
The US Deep State is the Democratic-Republican Uniparty, and it’s not going quietly into the night confessing, yeah, yeah, we have been working for our careers and our pathological fear of The Church, not for our country.
Holier-than-thou touches upon the faux-theological (aka heretical) depth of the ruling class’ systematic perversity: rejection of the observation of universal estrangement and its physical-to-spiritual consequences. They think there is some small part of the world free of Sin (estrangement, alienation, anxiety) and they are it whereas everyone else is full of it, i.e., Sin and its consequent sins. This is classical Humanism and Talmudism, not Christianity.
Update 1: Wretchard (Richard Fernandez) gives a brilliant exegesis of Founders’ reasons for distributing/decentralizing power:
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
… and then he looses me:
2016 should have been an election charged with passion, but it is atmospherically deadening, as if many voters wished the candidates would just go away.
So I replied to one of the consistently thoughtful commenters:
intellu, I think I understand what you are saying, and concur, but with this salient quibble and this I hope salient thought:
Quibble: their American colonies were the richest part of the British Empire, thus the war to keep them bound.
Thought: physical distance and difficult commo, such as the colonies had, encourage self-reliance. As population grows and commo intensifies, heat is generated, meaning, psychic and spiritual heat, not AGW. That heat has a melting effect as well as a clarifying one, and from those effects first an aggregation and then a polymerization, so to speak, of the now hot, close psychic, spiritual and even physical structures occurs, making outcomes unexpected but still trajecting by universal and constant patterns.
Wretchard lost me at atmospherically deadening. The atmospherics I see are scintillating, rather like metal in a crucible at full burn. There is dead coming out of a crucible, of course, namely, what did not belong to the ore.
intellu responded with some useful data points and I responded to him as follows:
Yes, I think also Wretchard is afraid of what is coming, whatever it is. This tells me he joins a distinguished host of wise guys who have diagnosis down or pretty much so but as for prognosis, nyet, most not even trying. Basically, they are non-players. The list of them is very long and includes virtually all, to include especially Neo-Cons, who are returning hang-dog to their party of origin, Democratic.
And Republican Neo-Cons are confirming everyone else’s suspicion that they belong to the Democratic-Republican Uniparty (GOPe), all along.
But that’s a side matter to my main point, which is that the likes of and lessers than (whose number far exceeds the likes of) Wretchard, are empty-handed medics. They mostly or almost sufficiently know what’s wrong. They do not know what to do about it. They cannot play because they have fashioned no toys.
This is a catastrophic failure of intelligence. A world-critical declination. I do not know its parallel or precedent this side of the First Century AD. I am not afraid of it. I have done my best to supply the need, well or badly is not mine to decide.
Update 2: The Historic Jewish Enmity Towards Christianity
Update 3: The Battle Over Al-Azhar
Update 4: El-Sisi sends sharp, clear message to Turkey on Libya
Joel D. Harrison: The Most Important Thing You Need To Know About Friedrich Schleiermacher’s Theology
AUM NAMAH SHIVAYA