RAMANAM
In the Name of The Father, and of The Son and of The Holy Spirit, Amen.

Countrymen,

Until the 1970s, most prelacies saw the danger — to the good order of society — of the birth-control pill.  The Roman Catholic prelacy was among those that did.  Before and after the 1970s, a few prelacies saw the danger — to the good order of society — of sodomy.  The Roman Catholic prelacy and most others did not, or did not say that they did.  Even when some prelacies received lawsuits for sodomy by their members, most refrained from declaring sodomy per se dangerous to the good order of society.

In fact, sodomy imperils the good order of society far, far more than does the pill.  A decisive number of women has intelligence sufficient to grasp that promiscuity — the reason for the pill’s invention — harms the good order of society.  Reason: promiscuity does not answer and in fact defeats a woman’s primary goal in life, which is to enjoy the protection of a man, in which and with/for whom to suckle her and his children.  Enough women get that to make the pill not a major harm to the good order of society.

And in any case, were harm done, it would be the woman taking the pill, not the pill itself, harming the good order of society.  Where it harms, the pill is a Class F, low-order agent.  The woman who takes it and her subsequent behavior are the Class E and B, respectively, higher-order agents, if harm occurs from the taking.

By the pill I mean the one taken to prevent, not the one taken to abort, a conception.  The latter is murder, not birth-control.

Sodomy, on the other hand, is a Class A, highest-order agent meant not only to harm but to destroy the good order of society.  Upon a time, all prelacies knew that to be the case and said so.  Why is this so?

Sodomists labor to separate women from their men — and, especially, parents from their boys — so that sodomists can access those men and boys.  Men and boys are sodomists’ goal.  Women obstruct that goal.  Therefore, sodomists find ways to lure women away from their men and boys.  They seduce women to think of them, sodomists, as the perfect human passion in the perfect human form practicing the perfect human activity.  And women fall for that line.  Lots and lots of women do, of all ages and ranks.  And now said women think their men queer and sodomists men.  With that, and a critical mass of women so deceived, good social order ceases to exist.  The which, largely but far from entirely, describes USA society right now.

Political correctness, war on women, war on bathrooms, war on the military, diversity and inclusion, social justice, war on education, war on police, war on national sovereignty, war on personal liberty, war on US Constitution and law … well, women estranged from their men and in thrall to sodomists drive those attacks on the good order of society, and other women organize feeble gestures of remonstration against attacks threatening their status and livelihood while secretly approving sodomists’ and their female minions’ attacks against the general good order of society.

Fundamental, cause?  Sodomists have separated a critical mass of women from their men and boys so they can get at those men and boys.

There are your oligarchs against whom [normal] men and women today are rising.  Not only billionaires among sodomists — and there are very, very many of them — are oligarchs in the sights today of normal persons’ intentions.  Sodomy is intrinsically oligarchic, elitist, sanctimonious and autocratic.  The modern oligarchy is an entire class of embodiment and not merely a cabal of extraordinary wealth and influence.

Sodomists are insatiable oligarchs and misogynists.  Men, neither.

There are two kinds of sodomist: homosexuals and queers.

Homosexuals — until lately — kept their activity to themselves and a close circle of acquaintances.  Some are highly skilled at this and that and lead apparently ordinary lives.  Until recently, when so many became extraordinarily wealthy with respect to money and elevated with respect to position, homosexuals kept away from women and girls and did not promote their activity in public.  Now they flutter about to flatter women and girls and pay others of their class in the public view to promote sodomy for all.

Queers are the so-called flamers: in-your-face, look-at-me, be-disgusted-or-converted attack dogs of the genetically incomplete embodiment.  Queers are the battalions loosed by wealthy, influential sodomists and their female minions, especially in HR and other bureaucracies, against women, for the war on women, the war to remove the obstacle women are to sodomists’ access to men and boys.

Women are more prone to fear and anger than are men.  PC is a female obsession, driven by women’s fear, but only in the absence of men taking care of them.  Women naturally want protection, they are physically weaker than men and have close responsibility for rearing the race.  Women depend on men to protect them and the children they suckle.

Now, who cuts across that time-tested, experience-guaranteed paradigm?  Who drives women from the men they look to for protection?  Who wants the men — and especially the boys — for themselves?  Sodomists.

Want to restore skill and daring?  Drive sodomists back into the closet.  They are the oligarchy normal persons feel panting at their backsides.  The world is backwards because, regrettably, men allowed sodomists to slip between them and their women.  Domestic policy includes shoving sodomists back outside the normal order of families and society.  One at a time, family by family, until it is done.

And note: nearly the entire Moslem prelacy is accountable sodomists, part-timers and full-timers, married with children and single, along with statistically significant fractions of their congregations, in some countries more than in others, but especially very, very many in Gulf countries, clergy and lay, married with children and single.

Update 1: Salon Editors: We Should Have Let The Axis Win

AUM NAMAH SHIVAYA