Chaitanya Jyothi Museum Opening, 2000
RAMANAM
In the Name of The Father, and of The Son and of The Holy Spirit, Amen.
Countrymen,
ORBIS NON SUFFICIT
SOLUS DEUS SUFFICIT
Directly upon the attacks on American buildings on 11 September 2001, I searched internally for the name of the attacking force. The name I found was Arab/Pan-African Imperialism. For many years I used that name in predecessor platforms of this blog and in comments on other blogs. Then, not many years back, a Professor of History I respect suggested I use the name Caliphism in place of the name Arab/Pan-African Imperialism. I accepted the Professor’s suggestion and went through this blog making the switch.
Today I am unhappy I did that. The Professor’s name was right, but mine was righter. Arab/Pan-African Imperialism attacked American buildings on 11 September 2001 and continues subverting, infiltrating and attacking American institutions to this day and until stopped. The Professor saw a religious entity. I see a racial entity. Race is the deeper motive in this phenomenon of war by Arabs and Africans. Religion is the more superficial motive. A switch back to the name originally found is indicated.
Goethe: When you trust yourself, you will know how to live.
Today conservative intelligentsia is all in a twit because Russia and NATO are moving military assets to Baltic borders and Levantine acres, but, USA Democratic-Republican Uniparty propagandists ignore these advancing signs of war. Not a wrong point, but a superficial one. As such, it motivated me to look deeply at impellers of this so very unnecessary and costly positioning.
Russia has the world’s most sleep-breaking territorial integrity conditions. Rational USA foreign policy would offer her undisturbed nocturnal refreshment in the form of guaranteeing peace in the nations she calls her near abroad (especially the Intermarium), which is to say, buffers between Russia and the Germanic Tribes to her west.
Twice those tribes have tried to split Russia from her Eastern and Southern reaches and not once has Russia, unprovoked, essayed the same or even a similar military push into those aggressive Germanic Tribes. Although, this bears note: that under socialist rule Russia did very extensively push occupation, subversion and counter-intelligence into the Germanic Tribes and into virtually the entire sisterhood of nations. Her actions there were imperialistic, but they were also paranoid, for good reason, with a view to her seemingly endless, indefensible frontiers and her experience with Mongols, Turks, Persians and Slavs to her east and south and Germans to her west.
But beyond that, there is this curious phenomenon: that whereas Russia and Europe, to include the Intermarium, repeatedly and successfully defended their lands against Mongoloid/Pan-Slavic Imperialism — which in the original was mostly Moslem — now only the Intermarium and Russia are defending their lands against the current hegemon, Arab/Pan-African Imperialism — which is entirely Moslem. Europe and her New World of the Americas welcome Arab/Pan-African Imperialism onto their lands and over their families. Or, more accurately, the leftist political class having administrative control of those lands welcomes Arab/Pan-African Imperialism to overbear those lands and families on them whom they should steward.
One may ask why Europe and Russia opposed Mongoloid/Pan-Slavic Imperialism but Europe does not oppose Arab/Pan-African Imperialism. The answer is Christianity. Religion, culture and morality construed from Christianity oppose imperialism of any kind. Europe and her New World of the Americas are no longer construed from Christianity whereas Russia remains construed from Christianity. Russia rejected socialism in favor of her traditional semi-absolutism with Christian resolve (remember, Christianity is not a politics). Europe and her New World of the Americas embraced socialism — even while defeating two of its politics, Nazism and Communism — in order to reject religion, culture and morality construed from Christianity.
The effort succeeded: Europe and her New World of the Americas destroyed their leader breeding stock and dissipated their heritage in two world wars against The Spiritual Community, The Church. Now the socialist, left political class is afraid remnants of religion, culture and morality construed from Christianity survive, especially as Russia, so they want to stamp out that breeding stock and its inheritance … and expend more of their own to get the job done.
Christianity is the great enemy of socialism whether secular, Talmudic or Moslem. Reason: Christianity is not a politics.
The left — secular, Talmudic and Moslem socialists — has turned their stink eye on Russia because Russia remains construed from Christianity. Not particularly pleasantly construed, but from Christianity none-the-less. That is Putin’s sin in socialists’ sight.
Still, the military assets being talked about are minuscule on both sides although on the Russian side they constitute nearly their full order of battle. And Russians are not stupid about such disparities.
Russia’s economy is about the size of California’s. Her military is severely weak in depth and strong at the SOF spear-tip only — note Ukraine stopped her in Ukraine’s east. One small, superannuated oil-burning carrier is a cause for panic? Only to anti-Christian lunatics.
Russia should be a USA ally, along with India, to reject Arab/Pan-African Imperialism in its native lands as well as in its colonized ones (Germanic Europe, to include Great Britain) and get on to the major strategic problem of this era: China.
Update 1:
MODERN DAY TROJAN HORSE: AL-HIJRA, THE ISLAMIC DOCTRINE OF IMMIGRATION, ACCEPTING FREEDOM OR IMPOSING ISLAM?
by Sam Solomon and E Al-Maqdisi
(ANM Publishers, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.)
Soft: 139 pages.
ISBN 978-0-9794929-5-2.
Review by Joseph Poprzeczny.
Citizens of New World nations – North and South America, Australia and New Zealand – invariably assume that anyone settling in their country will inevitably embrace and cherish their ways so will move to integrating into what’s been called their demographic “melting pot”.
New World nations have well-established traditions of live-and-let-live, egalitarianism, individual liberty and equality.
And their citizenry abides by a valued range of modern practices, most especially democratic governance, that are viewed as permanent features of their political and civic orders and that these will forever survive.
However, what such understandable presumption ignores is that these attributes and practices are only some 200-years old whereas authoritarian theologically-sanctioned governance and the migratory tradition of Islamic peoples who settled vast expanses of non-New World lands – North, West and East Africa, the Balkans, and south and central Asia – have been in play for almost 1400 years.
Modern era Christian or European emigration to distant corners of the world is thus far more recent than Islam’s spread up to the shores of the eastern Atlantic (Morocco); Central Asia (Xinjiang, China); and the southern extremity of South-East Asia (Mindanao, Philippines).
Furthermore, Islamic migration and settlement is based on markedly different precepts, one’s diametrically opposed to those of the New World whose citizenry invariably welcomed newcomers and promoted “melting pot” integration in part because they and their forebears are appreciative beneficiaries.
Islam does not welcome religious diversities.
It has instead always set about dominating those of other faiths, and relentlessly seeks to convert from within what they call infidel ranks.
That, in a nutshell, is the overarching theme of Solomon’s and Al Maqdisi’s important enlightening book, Modern Day Trojan Horse: Al-Hijra, The Islamic Doctrine of Immigration, Accepting Freedom or Imposing Islam?
More specifically, they’ve outlined how Islam utilized and promoted migration since the 7th century so its adherents could Islamise peoples of newly-settled lands whereas settlement by Europeans, who began populating the New Word on a significant scale only after the 18th century, have done otherwise; tending to accept, even welcome, settlers to add diversity to their “melting pot”.
More recent times have come to see something unexpected and unique.
In the latter half of the 20th century, after nearly 1400-years, Muslims began to increasingly emigrate not only to New World countries, but, significantly, into central, southern and western Europe.
The question that’s therefore inevitably posed is which traditions and modes of governance will prevail in the New World as well as Europe during this and coming centuries; that of the less than 300-year old egalitarian “melting pot”, derived from modern European settlement; or Islam’s nearly 1400-year old practices that impose dogmatic theocratically justified laws and codes called Shariah.
Solomon and Al Maqdisi show that Islam embodies a long-standing doctrine of emigration, called Al-Hijra, which is designed to expunge, not tolerate, other creeds and practices.
Islam not only doesn’t accept this but rejects outright the notion of diverse “melting pot” societies as have emerged across the New World over the past two or so centuries.
This arises from Muhammad’s relocating from Mecca to Medina in 622AD.
While in Mecca he’d compiled meticulous plans on how to create an Islamic State.
Immigration for Muslims is thus as old as Islam itself and is, indeed, crucial in understanding its expansion.
Al-Hijra theref0re predates even militant jihad, which is the resorting to warlike conquest of non-Islamic peoples by Muslims. It is the crucial opening gambit in Islam’s expansionism that began with Muhammad’s arrival in Mecca.
Al-Hijra is thus viewed as a crucial transitional phase or stage in the spreading of Islam and preparing for jihad.
And it must be stated that there is sound historical reason for this.
Muhammad’s 13-years in Mecca had little to no success.
But on relocating – his Hijra – to Medina, in less than a decade he emerged as ruler and prophet of Arabia and was poised to engage the nearby Christian Byzantine and Zoroastrian Persian empires.
That, incidentally, is why the Islamic calendar begins with the Hijra, since it celebrates the transforming of a weak disunited desert peoples into a “powerful political entity” that went on to creating a formidable army backed by a united community that became a “powerful socio-economic political state.”
That’s why Solomon and Al-Maqdisi do not regard Islam as a religion, as understood in the West, but rather as “a whole encompassing political system, garbed in religious outfit, addressing every aspect of the life of its adherents.” (p.93)
It is best viewed first and foremost as a military doctrine and secondly as a technique of ensuring permanent occupation of the conquered.
After Muhammad succeeded converting Medina’s pagan tribes to his views surrounding Jewish and Christian groups were methodically subjugated to his newly-founded dogmatic rule.
His words and deeds were seen as synonymous with Allah’s desires and Hijra, migration, became obligatory to help spread his new desert faith far and wide.
That said it should be noted that not all Muslims entering non-Islamic lands are necessarily motivated by Hijra.
But this matters little since there is invariably always established within the welcoming non-Islamic society a well-refined network of highly motivated Islamic community organizers based in mosques whose sole duty is to help ensure the creation, within the host country, of a self-segregated Islamic community.
In other words, it’s at this early point of contact that the hoped for – by the non-Muslim receiving nation – “melting pot” is not permitted to be realised.
And, in the words of Gideon, author of the preface to this important work, such self-segregated entities begin “asking for more and more rights and privileges to the point of the recent adoption of Shariah Family Law in the United Kingdom.” (p. vii)
Solomon and Al-Maqdisi methodically and meticulously analyse and describe this long-established anti-“melting pot” tradition that outlines how separateness inevitably unfolds.
Their description includes attribution from Islamic texts and sources that justify and reinforce the construction of such separatism.
Although this tradition and practice is nearly 1400-years old is understood and fully appreciated by only a handful of western politicians and public policy advisers.
In the main westerners and especially their political elites continue to cherish the hope that somehow their case will become the exception with incoming Muslims opting instead for the “melting pot”.
But history as well as contemporary press and other reports from around the world continue to show that the outcome already is and will continue being otherwise.
“The Islamic community consolidation system works through a network of volunteers and other paid ‘pious’ individuals who act as community or mosque liaison officers, who keep a close eye on the community by policing the new immigrant arrivals,” Solomon and Al-Maqdisi say.
“As the new migrants naturally gravitate to the food stores of their country of origin or other places of meeting such as cafes, restaurants, and other outlets, the community/mosque workers take it in turn to frequent these places and introduce themselves to the new migrants.
“These volunteers are very smooth and skilful salesmen who know how to express sympathy and empathy to the new migrants.
“They offer help and, known the systems of the host country, they quickly manage to facilitate a lot of things for the new migrants.” (p.17)
Such purposive alms giving can include arranging temporary accommodation, lending money, even provision of free food.
“The mosque/community workers cast their nets very wide, meaning they do not limit their activities only towards them, they work even harder in recruiting new converts to Islam from the host community, as well as the children of the migrants who may be in their third or fourth generation,” the authors says. (p.18)
Their primary or immediate aim is creation of “a successfully visible Islamic society” that must be “separate and distinct”.
These community workers do not wish to see Muslim entering the “melting pot” they wish to see them standing well away from it.
Solomon and Al-Maqdisi stress that western universities are also not overlooked. These campuses have Muslim Student Associations where students are recruited for various forms of advocacy and other communal works.
Islamic studies are also being avidly promoted on western campuses.
This includes the financing of professorial chairs and research projects that are endowed by oil rich Middle Eastern benefactors.
This, the authors say, helps explain why so little “textual analysis of the Qur’an or a proper assessment of violence in Islam can be found” (p. 89) in the seemingly objective scholarly works that are written.
“Today,” Solomon and Al-Maqdisi write, “we are witnessing the greatest Islamization efforts ever, especially in Europe, Canada, USA and Latin America – all the major bastions of Christianity.” (p. 88)
A close reading of the Australian press and certain select journals and other recent publications shows the authors to be remiss in not including Australia in their list.
Notwithstanding that oversight Modern Day Trojan Horse must rank highly amongst the most significant books to be released since 9/11.
Update 2: Deborah Weiss: 9-11 Fifteen Years Later: Are We Safer?
Update 3: MSNBC Commentator: ‘FBI Spy-Catchers Took Down … Victor Davis Hanson’
My comment: Modern Democrats, many of them red-diaper babies, loved Russian and Chinese Communism, worked for it, sorrowed over the demise of the Soviet — and still love the Chinese version. But then Russia regained her Christian base. And that makes Russia, and Putin, Democrats’ enemy. It is her Christianity that makes Russia the enemy of Democrats — and not a few Republicans. Socialism (Fascist, Communist, Talmudist and Sharia) arises from fear and hatred of Christianity. That explains the Democratic-Republican Uniparty’s stink eye at Mr. Putin and Russia generally.
Update 4: Gaining From Migration: Towards A New Mobility System Right!
Update 5: How Global Elites Forsake Their Countrymen
Update 6: Principal reason, now, that USA must exit NATO: Eurabia, led by what are now mistakenly called Germany and France.
Follow-on to NATO will be some structure with Russia and the Intermarium to keep Eurabia from heading east. Essentially, swing USA’s European force vector 180 degrees, from east to west.
That will be part of a larger structure, to include India, Mongolia and some Southeast Asian nations, to triangulate or quadrangulate China.
… unless arrogance like von der Leyen’s completely sours Trump on NATO.
May be a good chance of that happening. Germany has been on security welfare provided by USA for how long now? And she presumes to hector her benefactor. Head of NATO did as well last week.
No, NATO is obsolete. It is not 1947, nor yet 1991. von der Leyen is proving the point. I say, “You go, girl!”
Update 7: The notion that refugees and immigrants should be admitted to a sovereign nation without caveat or demurrer is conjured by two essentials of Liberation Theology, itself a successful KGB subversion operation: precarity and what lately is called weaponized empathy (classically: scrupulosity). Both are perversions of Christian doctrine (aka experience) with the end in view of disabling Christian civilization by eliminating citizens’ ability to tell truth from fiction and thereby defend themselves. Moslems, Salafist and Shiite, have taken advantage of the KGB’s success removing from so many Europeans and Americans their ability to discern what is in their interest. Socialists have gone insane from self-induced terror upon learning that more than a few Europeans and Americans retain the ability to think clearly enough to defend themselves. The answer, as always, is hearty laughter.
Update 8: The Strategic Condition Of Western Europe
AUM NAMAH SHIVAYA
