Onward Neocon Atheists, Marching As To Death

Scimus autem quoniam diligentibus Deum omnia cooperantur in bonum, iis qui secundum propositum vocati sunt sancti. And we know that to them that love God, all things work together unto good, to such as, according to his purpose, are called to be saints.

The premise of this study is baseless: China have no intention of conducting amphibious operations against Taiwan. What’s in that headache for them? Taiwan is returning to mainland governance by diplomatic stages and majority Taiwanese wish.

Were China to island-hop further westward, it would be to Palau. Taiwan is of no strategic value to China. Palau is if they make Honolulu or the Galapagos an objective for strategic basing.

US has neither means nor will to sustain war on another continent, much less in the middle of an ocean. Start it, yes, sustain it, no, win it, never. Ditto Japan.

CSIS are another CIA front, Neocon death cultists. Their About statement includes:

CSIS scholars bring their policy expertise, judgment, and robust networks to their research, analysis, and recommendations. We organize conferences, publish, lecture, and make media appearances that aim to increase the knowledge, awareness, and salience of policy issues with relevant stakeholders and the interested public.

IOW, Americans generally, and especially as a sovereign nation, be damned, they don’t matter. CSIS live happily in the sealed USG echo chamber, Neocons, like RAND, another CIA front. They think like Germans when they try to think at all, as here: up the middle with the fullback.

China, and especially Russia, do not work that way. Assuming they do or would only marks one as ignorant and self-absorbed: Russia lost the SMO because she didn’t take 2M of her children as casualties in the first week by storming Kiev, the way I would have done, say Neocons, who are a death cult.

Whenever I see or hear the word stakeholders, I know my neighbors and I are of no interest to the writer or speaker. I do so love being dismissed as unimportant.

Andrei Martyanov’s take on this CSIS paper is instructive, as usual, and here. And here:

Principle I

The United States have no authority in the domestic affairs of other countries and expect other countries to reciprocate by not feigning authority in our domestic affairs. The United States have interest in the lines of communication running between The United States and all other countries and expect all other countries to bear fairly the burden of keeping those lines open, safe, reliable, fair, and clean.

Principle II

The United States welcome alliance with our brother nations India and Russia for enforcement, from their perspectives, of the ground of statecraft set forth in Principle I and urge Japan and Egypt to join us for that endeavor and commitment.

Principle III

An order to deploy which lacks or frustrates intent to compel a target to sign a declaration of unconditional surrender is an unlawful order by the Rules of Just War, the Conventions of War, Common Sense, and the Spirit of America. An order to deploy conveys this intent to the Commanding Officer: win this war / battle in a timely manner at the lowest possible cost to yourself and your enemy or do not come back alive.

Ramakatha Rasavahini 1

Bhagavatha Vahini

Ramakatha Rasavahini 2