Naresh Jotwani: The Harder They Come . . . .
Beautifully written, elegant English language, elegant Indian manners.
FWIW, in place of the West, the East, etc., I suggest simply naming the country or region intended: The USA, Mongolia, Latin America, Eurasia, London, Jerusalem, etc. Everyone knows who is causing world upset today. Instead of the West, one can say with useful specificity, for example, New York and City of London financial speculators.
Jotwani observes, the West, etc., is operationally useless for being vague and quite unfair to many. For example, I am honored to be a natural-born citizen of The USA, and my parents were natural-born citizens of The USA, as were their parents, and I abominate what liars, cheats, and thieves with specific names and with hands on powers of my government are doing in my name here and abroad. Denominating me the West is intellectually incompetent as well as unfair to me and the West.
We’re talking here about a very specific criminal enterprise of very specific heritage, not the West, not me. Put another way, I am the West, I am America, and I hate and condemn what is being done in my name by people who despise God as well as my country and me.
NeoCon increases conceptual-linguistic specificity regarding the intended object of interest, the crazies, to use Jotwani’s term, but not enough to develop effective responses regarding it.
FWIW, nominal phrases such as Empire of Lies, The Hegemon, Anglo-Saxons, Anglo-Zionists, etc., are corny epithets not useful in civilized discourse much less statecraft, where conceptual and linguistic precision of engineering quality is a required competence — Jotwani is an engineer, thus the ananda reading his prose.
Several years ago, one observed Kurds kicking and shoving to achieve recognition as a state or at least a statelet. One hoped they could develop conceptual-linguistic competence sufficient to be taken seriously in diplomatic circles of the major nations in situ. One was disappointed. Their concepts and language remained infantile, pugilistic, self-centered. Nations in their area disregarded or disrespected them. Kurds remain in diplomatic backwater despite having a splendid deep history and very fine personal and social qualities. For the same reason, and even with CIA’s unremitting support, ISIS, AQ, Taliban, etc — Moslem crazies — cannot be taken seriously and lands they harass or rule must be over taken eventually by serious nations.
FWIW, it’s time to come clean on what we mean by NeoCon. Jotwani uses crazies, which is accurate but generic, lacking needful and available specificity. Everyone knows NeoCons descend from a very specific ethno-culture (Ashkenazy Judaism) who successfully cultivate a very specific support structure among two much larger and more variegated ethno-cultures — Anglican and Jesuitical — and that very many of the latter have accepted to live in fear of being labeled anti-Semitic in media beholden to Ashkenazy Jews or their Anglican and Jesuitical acolytes.
A man of God does not accept to
live in fear except of God.
NeoCon is needlessly vague. It insufficiently identifies the object of interest. In place of NeoCon, I suggest an operational specifier which also evokes the historical antecedent of NeoCons’ ethno-culture, their pique, and their historical teleology: Sicarii.
Crazies indeed, but of a specific historio-emotional sheaf, modus operandi, and modus vivendi — all related strongly to Moslem crazies, in fact. With their specificity clearly identified and carefully discussed, one achieves markedly useful tactical, operational, and strategic considerations for treating of NeoCon phenomenology.
Again, NeoCons and their acolytes Anglican and Jesuitical are Sicarii.
Principle I
Principle II
Principle III
By Artists M and F Graham
At Puttaparthi, Andhra Pradesh, India
