On Assimilation Of Moslems

RAMANAM
In the Name of The Father, and of The Son and of The Holy Spirit, Amen.

Countrymen,

On Londonistan:

A purpose of the Religions Parks concept is to force the issue, so to speak, of assimilation on a physical level, thus cutting the blab. Genuine Moslems will say yes to the idea, just as genuine Christians, Hindus, etc., will. The rest are clearly not representatives of the religions they claim to represent and therefore can be dealt with outside protocols of religious freedom, as they should be.

It is inconclusive to argue whether Islam is peace or violence or whatever since decisive-enough argument is easily made on any side of that debate.

Rather, the debate has to be made in the organization relationship, physically. Those who belong to the Spiritual Community — latent and manifest — will have no objection to supporting and appreciating every religion — the gist of the Religion Parks concept — and will welcome the opportunity to engage in the act tangibly. The rest …. are not members of the Spiritual Community and have no basis for claiming to represent it or any religion.

The Religion Parks concept, thus, is a convenient screen for recognizing whose affections or ultimate concern lies where and how.

This has very practical uses for both police and military operations.

Have any British jurisdictions specified territory within themselves where Sharia is the law, exclusively or conditionally?

No help on this will come from the churches here or in Europe. Reason: they have lost their own self-vision so cannot see what these evil bastards are doing in the name of Islam.

God is Spirit. The Church, therefore, is Spiritual, the Spiritual Community, and its actuality as the churches only more or less expresses the Church. And whether more or less, always ambiguously. The Spiritual Community is the transcendent unity of unambiguous life. The Church is He. The churches are unavoidably entangled in the conditions of existence.

The churches have forgotten and lost awareness of the symbolic nature of Christian language, especially its descriptors such as Body of Christ, Son, Father, Spirit, etc. These are taken literally so that the churches are thought of as the Church, the conditions of existence as God. Thinking and seeing this way is why the churches cannot help in the present crisis.

What is true of the nature of the Church and the churches is true of the nature of the Ummah and the ummahs. The evil bastards identify the Ummah, the Spiritual Community (same one as the Church, importantly) as their ummahs and more particularly their mullahs, the Swaggarts and Grahams of Islam: completely outside the Church, outside the Ummah.

Since that all-important discrimination is not in our cognitive tool kit — the Enlightenment taught us we are above needing to understand religion and theology, which are mere superstition and priest-craft — we are intellectually and therefore materially exposed to a lethal degree to just the direct, walk-in-the-park attack that has been mounted against us and all humanity.

I have said for years that our disdain for religion and especially its theological methods — in the name of an asserted all-sufficiency and pan-reliability of the scientific method — is a huge hole in our national security, both defensively and offensively.

This lady appears to have identified the hole and rather neatly, though hardly systemically, it would appear. Would that a theologian had been in a position to publish such a work! Journalists are way down the influence array.

There is no need for fear. However, it would be salutary were the distinction between Church and churches — paralleled exactly by the distinction between Ummah and ummahs — thrust convincingly into the orbit of those responsible for affairs on a day-to-day basis. The day is coming when that will happen. Then our pastors, priests, rabbis, imams and mullahs will be abandoned along with and to the same extent as the mullahs. It is directly relevant that the same are, almost all, queer, whether married to an oppositely gendered individual or not.

Update 1: John Hawkins: Why Liberals Support Moslems Who Hate Everything They Stand For

AMDG – VICTORY

Anita Ekberg
Anita Ekberg

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *