As Is The Feeling,
So Is The Result.

---

Where’s The Duty Officer?

Our Hindu-Christian white supremacy, systemically racist Constitution has done better at protecting inalienable rights than anything coming out of Africa or the Caribbean, so I think (1) it’s a keeper and (2) more Hindu-Christian white supremacy and systemic racism are emphatically indicated.

The endowed by their creator bit before the inalienable rights bit is the lynchpin of the Declaration and Constitution bits. Without that lynchpin, there are no rights, much less inalienable ones. The dull boys at Harvard want to pull that lynchpin, that is all. They do so abominate their place in life.

Let go of the left. We should not allow them — oligarchs of tech, finance, drugs, publications, munitions — to write our headlines. There is work to be done, building in all fields of endeavor, rather than wasting time, money, and energy chasing along behind lefties with brooms and dustpans.

Let the left go, for God’s sake,
and thereby our own.

Mike Walsh calls it the Bipartisan Fusion Party, Sundance calls it the D-R UniParty, Angelo Codevilla calls it the Ruling Party, George Wallace called it the not a dime’s worth of difference party. All point to the same phenomenon: USA governed by one party, to our detriment. The TEA Party Movement, had its leaders not succumbed to fear, could have become a second US political party, as would have been healthy for the country.

Instead, Donald John Trump transformed, pretty much, the Republican Party into a second party — Codevilla’s Country Party — set over against the legacy ruling D-R Fusion Uniparty, aka Deep State, the chief executives of whom long pitch their camp at Langley.

The whole is set in motion whenever deemed needful by Langley to scare the bejeezus out of everyone else. Who is the big terrorist of the world? Be not afraid!

David R. Graham
Langley controls. Their purpose: to scare the bejeezus out of normies. Their primary tools: oligarchs of tech, finance, drugs, publication, and munitions. Their secondary tools: NGOs, K-12 Education, Teacher Colleges, Ivies +, National Service Academies. Their tertiary tools: Local DAs, LEOs, Secretaries of State, County Election Commissioners, Teacher, other Unions, Street-level Kinetic Actors. Langley runs the show. Terrorists.

Scruffy to David R. Graham
You really think Gina has her shit that together? Brennan was using Halper, Downer, Azra Turk and Misfud but he controls a global cabal? Look, they need a house cleaning…at this point a demolition and a new name, building and get rid of 90% of their bloat, but they ain’t the Gnomes of Zurich. They f’up more than they get it right and now they followed wild Johnny B into the ditch.

David R. Graham to Scruffy
They f’up by your measurements, but by theirs? Who gave you news that you interpreted as their f-ing up? Their news outlets, right? Maybe they want you to think they f’ed up for some reason they consider beneficial to themselves. Have you considered that possibility?

My take on this:

A PRAYER FOR THE CIA
[whose stinking mess this is]

Almighty God, Loving Father, Divine Mother,
Swami,
Take me to where I can crack open the CIA
And wash away their guts onto the sands of time,
There to rot and dry back into the purity of Your ground.

Steven Fletcher to Scruffy
And the FBI did the same damn thing with crazy Jimmy C.

DSmith2 to David R. Graham
IMO they have about 1/1000th the competence needed to do what you suggest.

David R. Graham to DSmith2
Competence at what? At being incompetent, I’ll give you that. However, can you think of anyone in official or staff DC who wants to scrutinize CIA? Picture in your mind DC dynamics were CIA not present. Now, when, from OSS sending Russians back to be shot by Stalin to Aldrich Ames to Bay of Pigs to Latin America to Benghazi, has CIA caused anything other than chaos and sorrow? Yes, virtually every official and staffer in DC is afraid of CIA, mortally. Again now, competence at what? Many millions around the globe are mortally petrified at the thought of CIA’s competence. You want competence, I give you the devil’s ability to induce fear. That is competence. CIA has it in spades. Competence at cultivating American sovereign freedom, well, yes, CIA has no competence at that because they don’t accept it in the first place. They accept CIA sovereign freedom, which is not the same thing.

Cybernetic to David R. Graham
These are the same people who missed everything from the fall of the Soviet Union to 9/11.

Don’t imbue them with power they don’t have. They’re banking on those with the ability to oppose them lacking either the desire or the spine to do so.

David R. Graham to Cybernetic
How do you know they missed those things? Their media mouthpieces told you so? They’re banking on their inscrutability. Know anyone in DC willing to scrutinize CIA down to their bobby socks and chewing gum? Chuck Schumer’s threat to POTUS Trump in re the US IC CIA was not idle. He fears them.

Peter Hanely to Cybernetic
A conspiracy theorist might say the Intel community missed those events deliberately as part of a plan. Or maybe those events were missed because the agencies had a skewed view of reality and ignored clues that didn’t fit that world view. The latter strikes me as more likely.

David R. Graham to Peter Hanely
CIA does not accept USA sovereignty, only CIA sovereignty, right from the start. On that basis, it is entirely feasible that they let 9/11 through as part of their pattern of reveling in chaos while pursuing something they consider important to themselves. CIA is always out conducting their own operations with their own actors and often under their own funding, all of it black (although SEALS as their operational cadre is a known). If anyone is a conspiracy theorist, it is CIA, and they do more than theorize. They enact their conspiracies. That’s about all they do. For national security, of course.

---

Progressivism drives out reason,
in self-defense.

---

Stacy is right, decadent and depraved are suitable adjectives for the subject. Decadent was and remains a common descriptor of The West by Russian Orthodox prelates. Communists appropriated the word to their use, as Hollywood’s bright boys in berets have reminded us not infrequently.

My own alma mater, an Ivy Seminary (Union, New York City), fell depraved the year of my graduation, 1969, yanking then onto their faculty one James Cone, KGB baby extraordinaire by way of so-called Liberation Theology, which Jim rebranded Black Liberation Theology. Union was in the national news not long ago for worshiping flowers in James Chapel. Niebuhr and Tillich taught there, Tillich leaving in 1955, disgusted with the school’s triviality-trending.

Now West Point, an Ivy rarely denominated as such but one in fact prestige-wise, if not more so, has fallen decadent. Critical Race Theory controls the English-Philosophy Department. A group of recent grads, who held high rank in the Corps of Cadets, since June of this year demands — likely at academy command’s urging — that the entire academy promulgate Critical Race Theory, with its overtones. Last month occurred the second all-academy one-day shut-down and one-week focus for (1) self-confession of personal and institutional racism and white supremacy, and (2) instruction regarding the same. This was after POTUS, through OMB, expressly forbid such events on federal property, which West Point is.

Laurence Jarvik to David R. Graham
Why can’t Trump administration control the US military? What’s going on?

David R. Graham to Laurence Jarvik
That, my friend, is a serious question. Answer (best I can make it at the moment): for decades, their clergy and graduate schools beat patriotism out of them and globalism into them. It started with their clergy mal-exegeting the Parable of the Good Samaritan, a perfidy Bergoglio uses to construct his encyclical Fratelli tutti.

Now anti-patriotism — e.g., Critical Race Theory — runs at least one national service academy. I could trace some sources, with names, but that’s more than is required by your question.

Operationally, when patriotism flies and globalism lands, the victim preens on espousing a higher loyalty (Comey), which in practice is to their organization, the one in which they hold rank, and also to whomever they most fear inside or outside their organization. Pretty much everyone in the three branches of the USG today most fears the CIA, whose worthies effectively rule the USG thereby. Terrorists indeed.

Also operationally, when globalism takes over, GOs and ADMs, as they think today, have no country to defend, no Constitution to protect, so they have an excuse — paralytic morally, dazzling financially, suicidal politically — to forego strategic thought and advice, such as to POTUS, and stick to tactical proficiency only: killing, just killing, no strategic reason. JSOC today is superb at this.

For why loyalty to organization and point of fear replace loyalty to country, consider: (1) patriotism demands as few lethal conflicts, domestic or foreign, as possible — who wants their family fighting with or against all the neighbors all the time? — however, (2) globalism demands as many lethal conflicts, domestic and foreign, as possible — who can possibly deny, without being an evil racist xenophobe, that our neighbors need our assistance, protection, and guidance however we choose to give it to them? (hello USAID, three-letter agencies, and galaxies upon galaxies of NGOs).

Reasons, therefore, for GOs, ADMs and other officers, especially O5 and up, to espouse globalism: career opportunities and time in grade (affects retirement pay). Perpetual war benefits senior officers, especially O6 and up, or so they can calculate after being invited to that conclusion on the basis of the globalism already pounded into them. Senior NCOs, who also have patriotism beaten out of them and globalism into them — and by the same clergy and teachers — can reach the same conclusions regarding career advancement and retirement pay: war is good for us.

Call it spreading democracy, responsibility to protect, duty towards our fellow man, whatever, the desire for, effectively, endless war justified by an ideal called globalism, aka global governance, and enveloped, as we hear it, in protestations of executing a greater good (mal-exegesis, Parable of the Good Samaritan), all that is heady mead for inducing insouciance with respect to command and command intention communicated to senior officers by their actual C-in-C who is a patriot.

Note that at the recent West Point graduation ceremony, the COLs who run the Academy, and the Supe, set up POTUS, shod as he was in leather-soled shoes, to ascend and descend a steep, smooth metallic incline without benefit of handrails. The Supe, knowing the game afoot, wore soft-soled shoes. They wanted POTUS to fall and be injured on camera. They also sat him, an elderly man, facing the sun during a summer’s day at hot, humid West Point. They wanted him to pass out on camera. Academy command did that. It was intentional.

Like GOs and ADMs auditioning at Transition Integrity Project (and here) for billets in an imminent Obama Administration, Academy command regard globalism as ineluctable and their loyalty to its higher good steadfast. Patriotism and country are not among those worthies. Neither, therefore, is compulsion to heed a patriotic POTUS.

I hope this answers your question. I feel I did not have time to be brief. Warm and best wishes!

---

Jesuits. Jesuits are soldiers. The Vatican is a country. Having Jesuits in the prelacy is comparable to USA having an active duty General or Admiral occupying the Oval Office, commanding Executive Departments, Agencies, and Committees, leading both Houses of Congress, and comprising a majority the justices on the Supreme Court. The Ignatian Rule forbids members of the Society of Jesus to take up positions in the prelacy. Francis I is an imposter. His name is Jorge Mario Bergoglio.

FWIW: Comey Election is one way of putting it. Another is Equal Protection Clause Election.

I’d say a lot of normals are plum fed up with the galling criminal insanity of a whole lot of very rich people.

---

It’s about abortion, yes. But far deeper than that, it’s about preserving government officials‘ prerogative to force personal choices on citizens.

This prerogative, thoroughly un-American, Marshall and Warren inserted into American jurisprudence through Brown vs Board of Education. Race, in that ruling, was not the issue, just as abortion was not the issue in RvW. The issue in Brown, asserted affirmatively by Marshall — who asserted identically, but from SCOTUS’ bench in RvW — was whether government a judge or bureaucrat, sans vote by the people’s representatives in legislative session gathered, can compel — think, gun, arrest, prison — citizens to personal choices.

Barrett, lefties presume, threatens their love of the diktat by, potentially, reversing the assertion on which Marshall, with Warren’s approval, wanted Brown decided and later decided RvW. Lefties fear Barrett could re-Americanizing American jurisprudence.

Modern-day liberals and conservatives (D-R UniParty brothers and sisters) differ only with respect to the diktats they essay to compel on citizens’ choices. Their authority and right as government officials, through birth, pedigree, and familial networks, to throw diktats that force private citizens’ choices neither liberals nor conservatives ever question.

Even a hint of that question D-R UniParty brothers and sisters consider in very bad taste, morally repugnant, intellectually ridiculous, legitimately repulsive, and ain’t gonna happen. Liberals and conservatives disagree only about principles to enforce on those commoners. I so look with pleasure upon The Re-Americanization of Emily.

This blather, Counsellor, is pushing clouds from one area of the sky to another. The challenge to RvW and O-care is from the equal protection clause. It has nothing, ultimately, to do with abortion and medical care.

The kick, Counsellor, is because of something you never will get: government’s — any government’s — absolute and perpetual lack of authority to compel personal choice beyond what is fairly and honestly approved by citizens through their representatives.

Stated in the reverse: a person’s inalienable and unconditional authority and therefore responsibility, derived as they are from a person’s divine nature, a nature they share in equal degree with every other person, including crude ones, to make their own choices in life and put them into effect without compulsion unapproved by citizens themselves through their representatives’ fair and honest dealings.

Our Framers counted on our loyalty to our identical and mutually-shared divine nature, authority, and responsibility to keep us straight. And thems what gets down in the weeds of partisan bickering — or up in the clouds trumpeting vapidity — just do not get that simplicity, that grandeur of spirit, to the misery of all.

Counsellor, you do not care about your fellow citizens’ getting pushed around by free-wheeling government agents and elected representatives. Your care is to have your principles the one those agents and elected representatives free-wheel onto your fellow citizens.

I also did not watch the debate. My wife pressed me gently that maybe I should. I declined on grounds that Jill Biden is abusing her husband and nothing useful can come from that treachery of the marriage vows.

From reports, I get the sense that DJT, who can be as sweet, elegant, and charming as Rita Hayworth singing Bewitched, Bothered, and Bewildered when he wants to be, decided he should execute last evening as attack dog and did just that. He knew Biden would do that with even less self-restraint than usual given his compromised condition. I trust that DJT’s decision in this particular was proper. He would not get tricked or taunted into going attack mode. It had to be calculated and deliberate.

I also get the sense that Wallace’s issues were those of his class, not of voters. Nagorno-Karabakh, Ladakh, Assam, Palau, Baghdad . . . these are matters voters would know matter profoundly to them were they watching them or being informed fairly and honestly about them. OTOH, DJT also, and for good reason, likes to work such matters below radar where he can deal calmly person-to-person, as per Israeli-Arab matters.

Also from reports, and pretty strongly I must say, I get that whereas Mitt Romney, that Bulwark of conservative principles, wilted before Candy Crowley’s attack, Don Trump, that majestic man acting a clown’s part for the nonce, threw down Chris Wallace’s. Perhaps that was his reason for accepting to debate appear alongside a senile, wife-abused shell of a human personality. He was there to debate defeat Wallace, not Biden. Romney still has no such principles strength.

Archbishop Vigano: Open Letter To POTUS 25 October 2020, Solemnity of Christ The King
Cliff Kincaid: Red Faces Over Obama’s Red Mentor
Archbishop Vigano: EXC – The Great Reset: Bannon Interviews Archbishop Vigano
Josiah Lippincott: America’s Generals Lied, Lost Wars, And Looted The People They Claimed To Serve
Maike Hickson: Archbishop Viganò discusses the Great Reset, gives hope in light of Our Lady of Fatima
Robert Moynihan: The Vigano Tapes

---

• Sathya Sai Baba – Divine Discourse, April 15, 1964 /  Daily Email, Sai Inspires: Subscription

Βασιλεία του Θεού