Monsters In Bespoke Suits

Chaitanya Jyothi Museum Opening, 2000

RAMANAM
In the Name of The Father, and of The Son and of The Holy Spirit, Amen.

Countrymen,

ORBIS NON SUFFICIT
SOLUS DEUS SUFFICIT

The insanity of thrashing about in this jejune triviality whilst great matters of state and religion overbear the nation presses itself upon me with insistent vigor of late.  What nation can maintain their sovereignty whilst confused over which bathroom to use?  What guild of demons manipulates the law to undo justice and being itself?  How can such be respected, or honored, who distract the nation from matters of existential urgency to grasp for themselves the fleeting fire-flakes of fame and fortune?  No matter the outcome, their own actions trash their prestige.  And they cannot see that.  Woe to the nation hag-ridden by such a guild of monsters in bespoke suits.

Watching women cooing to one another today, I thought, “Why do they engage in this pointless ritual?”  Then I remembered a lecture on cougar behavior I heard two days ago, pointing out, among other interesting things, that female cougars are extremely careful to not enter one another’s territory unless of the same matrilineal heritage, whereas, female cougars bang about in male cougar territory insouciantly.

The naturalist gave as explanation, which I deemed reasonable, that, besides the obvious breeding impulses driving a female into male territory, female cougars give more thought to the consequences of injury from a fight than males cougars do and also realize that a female cougar can do them mortal damage and are more likely to than a male cougar is.  So female cougars stay away from one another, unless related matrilineally.

This meshes with numerous reports that women prefer working with men to working with women because woman-on-woman battle is more likely and more damaging to women than man-on-woman or woman-on-man battle.  So women cooing and giggling at one another, stroking as they used to describe it, is really a defense mechanism, a stand-off weapon, not sisterly camaraderie at all.  It’s motivation is fear, not love.  Probably everyone knew that decades ago and I am just getting the news.

And secondarily, in either man-on-woman or woman-on-man battle, the man is going to come off injured most unless he just takes the blows and the woman’s howling triumphalism convinces bystanders that she started the battle and deserves to lose it, whereupon the man can set upon her to extract his recompense.

Battle is the semi-constant but not natural estate of man.  This is why everyone abominates an aggressor … unless they are an attorney, in which case many think aggression is clever and admirable.  Well, it is not.  Nor is sarcasm.  Weak men aggress, yakking all the while.  Strong men bring down the hammer and walk quietly away.

No pickpocket or house thief ever stole as much as the Bernie Madoffs or Marc Dreirers of this country. There needs to be a special designation for these psychopathic monsters in bespoke suits.

Silicon Valley’s Next Gender Thoughtcrime

I think something really important is going on there [Google], reaching into the core of USA experience and practice, has decisive shaping power, for the better, of the country generally.  Whatever happens to Google as a corporation, a point has been made into the depth of the nation’s soul, that we comprise, thankfully, a nation of profoundly different and mutually necessary types of personality and physique, namely, men and women, or better, ladies and gentlemen.

St Augustine: Beauty is the radiance of truth.

So, if the sexes and races don’t differ at all, and if psychological interchangeability is true, then there’s no practical business case for diversity.  On the other hand, if demographic diversity gives a company any competitive advantages, it must be because there are important sex differences and race differences in how human minds work and interact.

Frank Lloyd Wright on Mies van der Rohe and their fellow German immigrants: ‘These Bauhaus architects ran from political totalitarianism in Germany to what is now made by specious promotion to seem their own totalitarianism in art here in America …  Why do I distrust and defy such internationalism as I do communism?  Because both must by their nature do this very leveling in the name of civilization.’

Liberals Are For Science—Until They’re Not

When theologians and liturgists declared their labors beyond scrutiny and correction, they precipitated a depopulation of Europe, Germany alone by about half.  This is no different in principle although perhaps so in effect.  The name is changed, to protect the guilty.  Same phenomenology, perhaps same outcome, although USA post-civil war de-classed polity works against another mass depopulation here.

Europe likely will depopulate again, only this time at the instance of a different set of theologians and liturgists: the new ones who have their totalitarian stochastic structure, to include class system, in-place upon arrival.  Here it will be the Indians, primarily, who try to re-class the USA and blow down her population, especially the Ebonic-and Spanish-speaking.

Glenn ReynoldsLefties don’t know much about history, because knowing it might interfere with feelings.

Update 1The Mental Self-Oppression of ‘Intersectional’ Racial Identity

Update 2: ‘Not all cultures are created equal’ says Penn Law professor in op-ed

Update 3: Spengler: Leftover Libels of Sebastian Gorka Served Up at Rolling Stone

Update 4: VDH: Trumpism is not an eponymous political movement per se. It was merely an adjective for the reification of far greater preexisting political realities.

Update 5: VDH: Trump’s High-Stakes Tweeting

Update 6: Celebrating Norwegian Christianity – With a Muslim Imam [not many more uninsulated live-wires to touch together in this one]

Update 7: Has liberalism taken a Soviet turn?

Update 8: Criticizing Google endangers your career.

Update 9: When a German case social worker wakes up to Islam

Update 10: Google.gov

Update 11: Comments on a post at Power Line Blog:

David R. Graham
Well, Bernie is a Judeo-Bolshevik, a breed of some consequence in the USA.  And the US embassy in Tehran was an espionage nexus, as are most such facilities in any country.  POTUS Reagan deployed a reinforced company of Marines to Beirut without providing them perimeter protection.  When the expectable happened, POTUS Reagan sat on his hands.  His GOs and ADMs, like POTUS Trump’s, were dopes and babies.  POTUS Reagan was steered by them where POTUS Trump is not.  It has taken a long time for Americans, including presidential candidates, to grasp how utterly stupid are the self-replicating supposed solons of the USG.

When POTUS Reagan ordered some retaliation against the Mullahs during festivities called The Tanker Wars, someone, probably his own SecDef, countermanded the order.  Again, POTUS Reagan sat on his hands.  Retaliation was never given.  GWB may have given Soleimani a credible threat to stop deploying shaped charges against US Army Strykers and HumVees.

But from 1979 until 2020, no POTUS answered the Mullahs where they think.  POTUS Trump is the second POTUS in the nation’s history to answer Arab/Pan-African Imperialism — which the Mullahs represent, their ancestors being Arabs exiled to Persia — on its own terms, where its proponents think, on their native turf.  POTUS Jefferson was the first.

Gary Thomson to David R. Graham
Read Carolyn Glicks piece entitled Donald Trump and the Mythmakers.  You can find it on her web site Caroline Glick dot com.  She lays out the case for Trump taking a wholly different approach to Iran.

David R. Graham to Gary Thomson
Just had a thought: perhaps at least part of Mossad’s early brief was to counter CIA activity.  I am thinking of the USS Liberty incident attack in that context.

David R. Graham to Gary Thomson
Thanks much.  Her exposition convinces this observer as far as it goes.  Her point about Trump diminishing the value of the FPE’s credentials and therefore their ROI of time, money, and energy is one I had not considered and am cheered now to recognize as fact.

I concur with her observation that the more Trump succeeds the harder it will be for the FPE to reestablish their hegemony upon his exit.  Personally, I estimate that they will never again have the hegemony they enjoyed for these many decades.  Reality is too heavy for them.  (The Biblical term for heavy is Glory.)

I await the reality-base approach to the larger MENA-USA strategic goal.  My studies of that aspect occurred under the title Three Brothers Doctrine, the three brothers being USA, Russia, and India.  I think that is the fundamental structure we have in our birth canal, so to speak.

Update 12: Josiah Lippincott: America’s Generals Lied, Lost Wars, And Looted The People They Claimed To Serve

AUM NAMAH SHIVAYA

Gina Lollobrigida
Gina Lollobrigida

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *