Answering Civil War With Revolutionary War

Chaitanya Jyothi Museum Opening, 2000

RAMANAM
In the Name of The Father, and of The Son and of The Holy Spirit, Amen.

Countrymen,

ORBIS NON SUFFICIT
SOLUS DEUS SUFFICIT


On 20 January 2009, the Democratic Party commenced its second civil war against the Union, against the Constitution of the United States of America.  Their aim is to dissolve the USA as a sovereign nation state, replacing it with … themselves in unconditioned control of something, not really specified, and it kind of goes by passing infatuations, addictions and fetishes, except, whatever they say it is, they run it, period, so shut up.  Now, in case there is any confusion or wonderment, that is what we call treason.

Soon thereafter, the Republican Party resolved to not oppose the Democratic Party purpose and to support some of its attacks against the USA.  Quite remarkable.  And again, treason.  Someone was threatened, frightened and handsomely compensated for toeing foreign agendas, without admission or publicity, and spreading misdirection by platitude. Moslem Brotherhood, perhaps?

Grumbles were heard, then complaints, then pleas and then defiance.  Turns out few Americans were amused to be attacked, humiliated, despised and overlooked.  No political party, as a party, undertook to represent or protect them.  Quite the opposite.  No political party, as a party, undertook to support and defend the USA against Democratic Party attacks and Republican Party connivance.  The parties presented those attacks as actions of loyal Americans.  Quite remarkable.

So, with both parties in the posture of treason, fighting a civil war against their country — meaning, against them — and with no party defending against that — as Lincoln and Republicans had done earlier, and successfully — Americans realized they must fight a revolutionary war for independence.  Another one.  Because the people they elected to foster their freedom and the sovereignty of their country chose to be strong on them instead … for their benefit, of course.

So now we have a revolutionary war, a war for independence, not a civil war, a war for unity.  The difference makes a difference.  That means it’s a war to sort out and restore the residence of sovereign authority.  This is more fundamental than a civil war.  This is abyssal.  Donald Trump says rightly that political support he enjoys is by a movement for a free and independent United States of America and not about him.  British citizens have grasped the point and Europeans have as well and are winding up to enforce it.

Brexit Letter: PLU = People Like Us
Brexit Letter: PLU = People Like Us

In this civil war, the ones who fight for unity — of each person, family, town, state, nation — are the ones who win the war.  Get far ahead of the current action, i.e., behind the enemy’s lines, in their rear areas (school accreditation organizations, school boards, town councils, do not attend or support progressive schools, etc.).  It’s a frame of reference thing.  For example:

Three Brothers Doctrine
Civil Defense Battalions
National Sovereignty


Βασιλεία του Θεού
Kingdom of God

Update 1: Maybe a start would be to have a political class that didn’t put “independence” and “sovereignty” in quotes, as if they were alien concepts.

Update 2: Vox never disappoints: 3 Reasons The American Revolution Was A Mistake

Update 3: Parties may be fine.  I don’t know. Humans tend to group, so probably fine or not, parties are inevitable.  Two things I see happening now with respect to R and D parties: 1- they have seriously grouped to R-D Party, and 2- they are merely grabbing for preeminence within their group.

Responsibility for citizens, national security and national sovereignty they feel none.  Opportunities geo-political rather than merely financial they see none.  Conceptual framework for not only managing but leading history they have none.  Coordination of what they say with what they do they want none.

Grabbing the chief’s feather in a closed circle of spiteful, ignorant, ignoble, pusillanimous, infantilized adults is their wish.  Weak?  In a manner of speaking, yes.  But that’s not the full of it.  Obsolete is closer.  A second political party is forming, gradually, so far without a name, or language for a synergistic frame of reference, but those are in the offing.  The third party that’s forming is Moslem.

Update 4: Kurt Schlichter: Why Democrats Would Lose the Second Civil War, Too

Update 5: VDH: The Origins Of Our Second Civil War

AUM NAMAH SHIVAYA

George Washington Statue, West Point
George Washington Statue, West Point

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *