Chaitanya Jyothi Museum Opening, 2000
RAMANAM
In the Name of The Father, and of The Son and of The Holy Spirit, Amen.
Countrymen,
ORBIS NON SUFFICIT
SOLUS DEUS SUFFICIT
This post continues one titled:
Three Brothers Doctrine: USA, Russia, India, Vanguard Of The World In New Being.
The Three Brothers Doctrine series of posts is available here.
When confronted by a belligerent, one steps through a list, more or less completely, more or less consciously, of responses.
First, against a belligerent one decides to:
- submit to them,
- try to appease them,
- try to negotiate with them,
- try to hold them at bay,
- commence irregular warfare against them,
- commence full-spectrum warfare to ensure their unconditional surrender, or
- some hash of the foregoing.
Second, one forges the field of battle on which the belligerent must fight.
Third, one carries to completion the logic of the response one has chosen when confronted by a belligerent.
The three brothers, India, USA and Russia, deserve one another’s allegiance. The doctrine of their partnership promoted in these posts posits more than an association of fading convenience. It posits a familial loyalty: a mutual recognition of each one’s unconditioned independence and liberty, and a mutual devotion to each one’s prosperity and safety.
This allegiance partnership is the field of battle on which three rampant belligerents should be compelled to fight. Those three are: Globalists, Caliphists and Chinese. The allegiance alliance comprising India, USA and Russia is the only architectonic of statecraft, the only field of battle, on which those belligerents can be defeated, either piecemeal or as confederated. Failing to forge this field of battle — a failure, by the way, which events and powers of being guarantee cannot occur — would leave the nations ripped by those belligerents, who then would shred each other.
So, best get to making the Indian American Russian allegiance partnership formal, now, and get it working, producing defeats of those belligerents, and their unconditional surrender, than waiting to be driven to it while yet more suffer under their hands.
The Three Brothers Doctrine series of posts is available here.
Update 1: Good News: Zoroastrian revival among Kurds
Update 2: Auspicious developments between India and Pakistan
Update 3: Sage words from Bing West at Hoover Institution: America The Weak. I commented to a commenter:
Good point. If I may try to clarify: President Bush and the Neo-Cons had no careful plan what to do after they overwhelmed Iraqi Armed Forces. Gradually, they tracked with a concept that emerged I think from Hoover Institution originally (?): for ME quiet, replace USA reliance on ME dictators (some of them, anyway) with reliance on USA-installed democratic societies where dictators just had been. The argument was, we’re more secure dealing with a democratically elected government than with a dictator. That argument is probably irrefutable.
However, making a democratically elected government rise in a former dictatorship is not easy, if possible at all. I think only Japan has done that and then only under the very wisest possible facilitation by GOA MacArthur. The Bush Doctrine was to develop mini-USAs with local color thrown in. Rather naive. And that, specifically, was the error at the base of the Bush Doctrine: a government of any kind does not come up on its own or even with outside help; it comes up only in, under, around and through the presence of a victorious domestic armed force. A nation only builds up and out around its victorious army (armed force).
As West says and implies, it would take 20 to 50 years of USA occupation to achieve an Iraqi armed force strong enough to guarantee the country’s independence and the safety of her government. And meanwhile, as West also says, the occupying force should pick the leadership for the country it occupies. It also is a military commander’s job (see SCAP in Japan), not a diplomat’s, to deem when that is accomplished (see heart-breaking battle between Bremer and Sanchez, because GWB/Neo-Cons did not grasp basics of statecraft, nation-building). GWB and the Neo-Cons did not see these phenomena clearly. Their successors do not want to see them and will not. Occupation is phase two of war.
Overall, the way out of this mess now is to forge a fresh multi-national partnership structure — specifically India, USA and Russia — to include growing protection by growing independence. Representative democratic (republican) government is not a universal good. It works only in Christian civilization and in particular those blessed with a legal substrate of English Common Law. Ergo, establishing such government in a non-Christian civilization is an irrational goal, QED.
Update 4: Natalie Nougayrède: Putin’s Long Game Has Been Revealed, And The Omens Are Bad For Europe
She gets the omens accurately, but her moral evaluation of them is faulty. Overall, a very important essay.
Update 5: Leadership: The Key To The Baltics (Russia testing and training in Syria and Ukraine)
Update 6: By this and so many other novel and dangerous developments, a complete, fresh international strategic partnership structure is indicated, forged from the common core of three brother nations: USA, Russia and India.
Update 7: Very interesting. A thought I had from this: depending on how it’s done, rooting out evil can cost more than the destruction evil perpetrates; in such a case, therefore, there must some measuring means other than cost/benefit analysis that compels movement to root out evil in preference to joining or tolerating it.
Probably has lessons for facing down this generation’s evil caller: Salafist Jihad in its many, many guises.
Somewhat related: a stat that has impressed me through the years: GOA MacArthur went from Brisbane to Tokyo with fewer casualties than the Navy sustained, with four Army and two Marine Divisions, at Okinawa alone. I forget the exact SWPA figure, low 50Ks. So there are methods of rooting out evil that incur less cost than the destruction evil perpetrates.
The great Hebrew Prophets did very much see the Almighty conducting Holy War. They describe it with considerable color.
Update 8: Iran, India, Russia, Kurdistan, Iraq, O My!
Update 9: How Poland Saved The World From Russia
Update 10: The Religion Iranian Mullahs Fear Most: Zoroastrianism
Update 11: The EU Always Was A CIA Project
Update 12: Spengler: Mitt Romney was wrong. Russia isn’t the biggest threat to the United States.
My comment: Indeed, Russia is not the biggest threat to the USA. But noting that is not solving the problem. Nor is saying jihadism is. After WWII an international structure was created to keep the peace and stable communications.
That structure’s obsolescence by on-going natural hubbub of nations — and anti-national sovereignty activists — demands a new, fresh structure for doing the same: keep the peace and guarantee communications. The Solons (statesmen) have NOT produced the same.
Here is a suggestion: Three Brothers Doctrine.
Update 13: The Fraud rejects cooperation with Russia in Syria.
Update 14: China is a nation of slavers. China cannot be stood down without being triangulated. That is by USA, India and Russia. Reference the geography. Only way to do it. There is the third offset strategy. It’s spiritual first, then diplomatic, military and financial, with technological later. Technology is merely means. Various kinds of pencils. That is all. There is no technological solution to any problem. Technology simply embodies a problem’s solution into a reproducible form. Problems are solved in will, ideation and mathematics. Technology is a result of those.
Update 15: To the Progressive/Conservative Uniparty, post WW II alliance constructions are rice bowls. Even when time turns said bowls to sieves.
USA is in Europe in three commands: SACEUR, NATO and USEUCOM. These commands argue, literally, over the flag of which should fly higher. NATO and SACEUR were created for conditions that no longer exist. If Europeans want to keep them, that’s their business. USA has no need of them. They are obsolete in re USA interests.
USEUCOM is relevant to USA interests. But it should be refocused based on a partnership between the Anglosphere, to include India, and Russia. Strategically and ideologically, Europe — excepting Poland — is at best a feckless friend of USA and ideologically always an enemy, an enemy of freedom, common sense and humility.
In place of Kennan’s Containment Doctrine, let there be established Three Brothers Doctrine.
Update 16: The NYT sneers hopefully for The End Of The Anglo-American Order [Anglosphere]. They mean they hope for the end of Christianity.
Update 17: Long, informative interview by Washington Compost of LTG Michael Flynn, U.S.A. Retired
Update 18: Richard Fernandez: The End Of Containment
One sits at table with a long-run hostile and rockets a short-run hostile as a message to the long-run hostile that they had better climb down. That is a Mafia communication technique that did not escape China’s attention.
Update 19: Sundance: Chinese Central Planners Forecast “Weak Growth” in Manufacturing and Housing …
I commented: I might be less downright about alliance between Russia and China. I see cooperation on specifics there but not fundamental common interest or presence in being. Russia has considerable common interest and presence in being with both India and USA. And they with Russia. So I would factor, as a squeeze, a partnership among those three leaving China no chair to sit in. Frankly, that partnership — USA, India, Russia — is the grand throttle on China’s hegemonic aspirations. There is not another one entirely able to do the job.
Update 20: L. Todd Wood: Putin Getting Played By China, Needs A Deal With Trump
Update 21: ISW: How We Got Here With Russia: The Kremlin’s Worldview
Update 22: Anthony Vinci: How to Stop China From Imposing Its Values
America’s alliances were built to address a Soviet military threat. The economic bullying that Beijing uses requires a different kind of collective self-defense.
This is a hoot! Vinci calls for a solution to the problem I have already solved with Three Brothers Doctrine.
AUM NAMAH SHIVAYA