Chaitanya Jyothi Museum Opening, 2000

RAMANAM
In nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus Sancti.  Amen.

Countrymen,

ORBIS NON SUFFICIT
SOLUS DEUS SUFFICIT

The purpose of this essay is twofold:

• To illuminate the purpose of NATO activity in the Balkans.
• To encourage its leaders and participants.

Ground:  There are two principles that organize a human community: the principle of comprehensive consideration and the principle of selective tyranny.  Only the principle of comprehensive consideration fosters the common welfare, and therefore happiness, and is, therefore, self-sustaining.

Sub-menus exist for each of these principles.  There are manners of comprehensive consideration and manners of selective tyranny.  Democracy is a manner of comprehensive consideration that can foster the welfare of groups containing a small number of members.  Republicanism is a manner of comprehensive consideration that can foster the welfare of groups containing a large number of members.  Fascism and Communism are both selective tyrannies.  Oligarchies and monarchies can be.  The concept or suggestion of anarchy is a rhetorical device for hiding the presence of selective tyranny.

Because there are manners of comprehensive consideration and manners of selective tyranny, the ordinary political taxonomy of right and left, conservative and liberal, is superficial and misleading.  There are right wing and left wing, conservative and liberal people of consideration, and there are right wing and left wing, conservative and liberal tyrants.

The essence of each of these principles that organize a human community is a stochastic structure or fundamental attitude/disposition that is ultimately a consequence of ontological faith or un-faith, not a party or political structure.  The natures of these attitudes is such as to make them and their representatives unable to coexist in the same neighborhood.  Just as God and Desire — Sanskrit Ram and Kam — do not mix, neither do consideration and tyranny.  For example, the American experience proves that “… government cannot endure permanently half slave and half free.” (A. Lincoln, Speech, June 16, 1858)

Electronics — an efficient form of transportation — has made our island home one and the same neighborhood.  R. Buckminster Fuller, a Scientist/Theologian, and Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, a Theologian/Scientist, are known for inviting our attention to this fact, which we experience willy-nilly.

Our real ontological condition is expressed by these rallying points:

One God
One World
One Race
One Caste

Names may be assigned to each principle (Latin principium, that with power to originate, to begin something) for organizing a human community.  The way of comprehensive consideration originates in Aryan/Pan-Celtic and Japanese/Pan-Asian Solicitude.  The way of tyranny originates in Mongoloid/Pan-Slavic and Arab/Pan-African Imperialisms.

NATO activity in the Balkans today embodies the will of Aryan/Pan-Celtic Solicitude to undo the capacity for belligerence of Mongoloid/Pan-Slavic and Caliphism.  Moreover, it embodies the determination of our human community to employ consideration rather than tyranny in the organization of her affairs.

The power of Aryan/Pan-Celtic Solicitude will be reestablished.  Current efforts will succeed.  Consideration is natural whereas tyranny is not.  NATO, and in particular the Armed Forces of the United States, are resolving the ancient puzzlement of Balkan disagreeability in favor of nature.  An era of peace and prosperity is taking birth before our eyes and we should be very happy that it is.

Details: The Balkans occasion trepidation because their disagreeability appears adamantine, and its sources undiscoverable, and widespread unhappiness on its account appears continuously to recrudesce.  The Balkans appear to be a forlorn hope.  However, such is not the case.

Five questions exist regarding any situation: Who?, Why?, What?, Where? and When?

• Scientists ask, What?, Where? and When?
• Philosophers ask, Why? and What?
• Theologians ask, Who?

Which is the important question?  Clearly, the important question is “Who?”

In the Balkans and elsewhere, Aryan/Pan-Celtic and Japanese/Pan-Asian Solicitude is the agenda of people who are right and Mongoloid/Pan-Slavic and Caliphism is the agenda of people who are wrong.  The situation is that simple.  The Balkans are a flash-point of incompatible ways to organize a human community.

Bear these salient realities in mind:

first, not all individuals of a group support the agenda of their group: for example, not all Serbs support Mongoloid/Pan-Slavic Imperialism nor all Kosovars Caliphism;

second, within a group that supports an agenda, factions fight over versions of that agenda.

The Balkans illustrate these two local phenomena as well as the general phenomenon of incompatible principles and modalities for executing them.

These entities support Aryan/Pan-Celtic and Japanese/Pan-Asian Solicitude: NATO, India, Tibet,, Iran, Egypt, Sweden, Finland, Russia, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Philippines, and sovereignties in South and Southeast Asia.

These entities support Mongoloid/Pan-Slavic and Caliphist Imperialism: Serbia, Arabia, China, Israel, Iraq, Pakistan, elements of Russia, most of Africa, Vatican and sovereignties in the Balkans and North and Central Asia.

Religion is not a factor in any dispute because religions foster consideration and undo tyranny.  Religious people support Aryan/Pan-Celtic and Japanese/Pan-Asian Solicitude.  People who claim a religious affiliation and behave inconsiderately are renegades, partisans, not religious.

Excepting interludes – such as under Benedict XVI – the Vatican since about 600 AD promotes a proprietary version of Mongoloid/Pan-Slavic Imperialism.  The Vatican is a nation, not a church, although a church is pleased to exist in its proximity.  The self-perpetuating hierarchy of officers who are this nation descend from East German (Slavic) and Central and East Asian tribals who overran the Roman Empire.  The hierarchy is long bereft of land sufficient to support national armed forces, so they sequester themselves by claiming the pacifistic nature of a church and cultivate proxies to enforce their foreign policies.

Not long ago, the Vatican declared Holy Crusade on Islam.  Communism is a Slavo-Semitic iteration of the French Reign of Terror, which dispossessed Vatican interests with others.  The Vatican hierarchy is anti-Communist from propensities anti-Semitic and anti-Slavic-not-of-our-kind.  Vatican antipathies for Islam and Communism reflect political agendas for political targets, not religious agendas, which have no targets.  Killings that NATO and Serbs accomplish, as Vatican proxies, in the Balkans fulfill Vatican policy for the region.  Such is the Vatican view.

The Balkans appear as a terra tremendum because a major Who? on the scene sequesters their agenda and their presence while fostering impressions of inscrutability and confusion.  We need merely to turn on the lights.  The Balkans are not a difficulty.  They are a disease long waiting to be cured.

Should NATO in the Balkans shrink from reestablishing comprehensive consideration as the way to organize a human community because activity there can be construed as proxy for a foreign agenda?  By no means.  The reasons for NATO activity in the Balkans self-generate and, therefore, precede both the accidents of history and the stratagems of opportunists.

History:  Two previous generations, those who fought in WWI and those who fought in WWII, declined to resolve the incompatibility of Aryan/Pan-Celtic Solicitude and Mongoloid/Pan-Slavic Imperialism, choosing instead a course of self-aggrandizement on the one hand and cooping (“containing”) of unruly neighbors on the other.  Their champion was a young academic at Madrassa Harvard who gave those generations the concept of containment, the essence of which was appeasement in service of an unmanly orientation.

Those generations waved off the counsel of professional wisdom as well as the experience of humanity.  Their decision for indecision — to occasion self-aggrandizement — wasted time, energy, money and lives.

Now a new generation, those who fought in Southeast Asia, Central America, Africa and Iraq, is determined to resolve our neighborhood incompatibility by facing Mongoloid/Pan-Slavic and Caliphist Imperialism through the manly and proven concept of engagement.  Their decision is correct and will be effective, improving the neighborhood and redeeming the gilded poverty of parents.

Labor improbus omnia vincit.  Improbable labor conquers all.  Rabbi Ben Anina quoted this proverb soothingly as encouragement for St. Jerome to keep translating the Old Testament from Hebrew, as he wanted to do, rather than from Greek, as most, including St. Augustine, demanded that he do.

It is the nature of nature to be considerate and the nature of NATO to guarantee nature.  Everyone is going to be happy.  The times are auspicious for action to reestablish what is right.

Postscript:  There are three occasions for war:  wealth, dominion and women.  The war in 1916 was about wealth: “the bankers’ war.”  The war in 1939 was about dominion:  lebensraum.  This war in the Balkans is about women: “ethnic cleansing.”

The female line is the key to good breeding.  Celts and Jews — European Sephardis usually are Celts — count familial succession matrilineally because, without DNA testing, only its mother gives incontrovertible proof of a child’s parentage.

Mongoloid/Pan-Slavic and Caliphist women tend to be jealous of the appearance of other female lines, especially Celts and Franks, because they tend to see those as more attractive than they are and, therefore, better breeding stocks.  This is especially the case vis-a-vis Serbian women and their Albanian counterparts.

The will for systematic dishonor of females and destruction of their genetic sheafs belongs to homosexuals and ogresses, not to men or to women.  Mrs. Milosevic, not Mr., is the person-in-charge in Belgrade.

Update 1: However, I don’t think it’s a coincidence that no such star is high on the list of those being mentioned.

Assuming those stars actually have light sufficient for a career of staring, I’m glad none is on Trump’s short list — precisely because they are political stars, careerist professional politicians!!!

I’d like in office anyone BUT a professional politician, anyone BUT one who craves the office, anyone who is NOT thinking about THEIR future.  The very mind-set which produces the concept of a political star with a future I find smug, anxious, cynical, elitist, and un-American.

If you want my vote because you want your concept of a career for yourself, you don’t give a damn about my soul and you don’t deserve my vote.  You deserve the sole of my shoe.

AUM NAMAH SHIVAYA