Chaitanya Jyothi Museum Opening, 2000
RAMANAM
In the Name of The Father, and of The Son and of The Holy Spirit, Amen.
Countrymen,
ORBIS NON SUFFICIT
SOLUS DEUS SUFFICIT
What is state-sponsored Caliphism/war-making?
Islamists have been bought by Saudis and are in bed with them. Saudis have also bought quiet of their own people.
A new word or phrase is needed to replace terrorism. For example, clerics driving nation-states to their ends. Caliphism.
As China practices it: negative hegemonistic state-craft.
As Russia practices it: energy hegemony, criminal/mafia proliferation.
Do not delve into Africa. They are a client, land-locked, idiotic, only a resource for outside special interests, including USA.
Beyond that, the meet did not discuss this question directly.
Which states are conducting it?
Saudis, Russia, China (wants India unstable), USA/European right-thinking network of clerics/academics/bureaucrats/media, Iran, Pakistan, Syria, Venezuela, etc.
Middle Eastern regimes need USA/Europe to exist. They are dependent states bitching out/attacking their supports. USA/Europe engage in state-sponsored terrorism by supporting Middle Eastern states that sponsor terrorism — and AQ in Libya?
The USA/European internal security problem is the whole class of “right thinkers.” Muti-Culti is an ideology, political goal and program set for creating a client class (voters, cannon-fodder) for the network of right-thinkers (the clerical/academic/media/bureaucratic monopoly).
How are they conducting it?
Energy strong-arming. In lieu of mandating its agenda, the push-back from which it could not overcome, the right-thinking network appeals to science, which it corners. The network cannot mandate its agenda because it could not overcome the push-back. Thus the creep into command economy/social order.
Why are they conducting it?
USA/European right thinking network opposes the concept and the actuality of a nation-state because both are constructive, they are a something that make structures a network cannot control. The network of right thinking persons itself should be the sole controlling structure. Deconstruction, remove nation-states/laws, replace with whatever the right-thinking concur at the moment (which could as easily be one thing as another). “Deconstruction” gives opportunity for new initiatives which make jobs and money for deconstructionists. “Deconstruction” front-loads careerism, be popular, the right-thinking network carries you and your career.
The meet did not discuss directly why Saudis, China, Russia, Iran, etc., are conducting state-sponsored terrorism.
Where are they conducting it?
The meet did not discuss this question extensively. Note was made that China has built a port in Baluchistan and wants fossil fuel pipeline through Afghanistan and Pakistan from the Central Asian stans.
Why is USA clerical, academic, bureaucratic, media and political leadership ignoring it?
They engage in it and support foreign and domestic terrorists groups. Clerical, academic, bureaucratic, media and political leadership are from the same stock and move as a flock, a herd. They are tightly networked, vigorously self-promoting. Their system is meant to breed conformity. The conformity could be of any political persuasion. Today it is deconstructionist/post-modern. Deconstruction/Multiculturalism is state-sponsored terrorism when directed externally and sedition and treason when directed internally.
The “right-thinking” people aspect of USA leadership is the root cause. Republicans, even, want to be counted among them.
What will it take to get USA bureaucratic and political leadership to face it?
If they faced state-sponsored terrorism they would imply that the USA is a state, and big, and has moral standing, and responsibility as a nation-state for its own security and that of others. This would undercut deconstructionist doctrine. Deconstructionist/“progressive” doctrine is that progressivism transcends nation-states and that the USA government is a tool to implement deconstructionist/progressive ideas, not a legitimate entity in and of itself. The USA/European network’s mission is to use the USA government to eliminate the USA as a nation state and emerge the network as global controlling agent. We see this logic and its course of action implemented by the progressive/deconstructionist network daily and with zeal. It’s all a big mess falling down, of course, but that’s not of concern to the network. The progressive vision of power is.
The meet did not directly propound an answer to this question. It implied one: on the one hand, the negativities of the progressive mess goad/foster/incite its end and successor, and on the other hand, the fundamental nature of the nation self-restores, self-reforms and self-persists.
What will it take to get USA bureaucratic and political leadership to defeat it?
This has to come from the public. Bureaucratic and political leadership will not defeat state-sponsored terrorism or terrorism at all. (DHS for example is reactive, always a war behind.) They will not defeat state-sponsored terrorism. The public has to gut the right-thinkers, the deconstructionists, and convince people (the public itself) to take care of themselves and the country. This requires the public to gain self-confidence, something that does in fact appear to be happening.
Self-confidence is going up because people are desperate and angry and have means, including especially communication. This enables drastic surgery by political will to cut USA programs, get rid of departments and agencies, not just reduce their budgets. Deconstruct deconstructionists’ self-serving initiatives.
People opposed to the agenda of the right-thinking network are the least likely to get involved. They are living their lives.
The USA Constitution is a rallying point.
Tie foreign policy to economics as citizens face it in their daily lives. This creates a rallying point.
What is the backstop against the network’s deconstruction/multiculturalism? What wall does it hit? Existence itself and specifically the existence of people who oppose deconstruction of the USA. Ultimately it is a question of ideas. One side will win by annihilating the other side, which will thereby lose. One side is defeated. One side wins. Neither compromise nor discussion is possible between fundamentally opposed intellectual/moral frameworks.
No part of the deconstructionist frame of reference can be removed or even negotiated without the entire framework falling apart. Remove any piece or examine it and the structure collapses. Its internals are neither consistent nor redundant and in consequence it can neither sustain nor evolve itself. Therefore, deconstructionism/progressivism cannot negotiate. It is an all-or-nothing system obliged to expand or defend itself as such.
Today you have to be in the system and change it from within. The right-thinking network may not have that much longer to last.
Kids and adults in USA today are massively drugged with anti-depressants, not to mention the illegal psychotropics. Kids today get apathetic or revolutionary/anarchist: medicinal apathetic anarchic describes today’s USA kids.
Update I: Socialists’ attraction to anti-American strongmen.
Update II: And Al Saud intends to keep it up. See also here.
Update III: Paul A. Rahe: … the inexorable growth of the administrative regulatory, welfare state is itself a threat to our capacity to govern ourselves.
Update IV: How about a RICO suite at Tom Steyer?
Update V: On 27 January 2015, Marine GEN (Ret.) James N. Mattis addressed the United States Senate Armed Services Committee on the subject A New American Grand Strategy. At Hoover Institution, who published an adapted version of General Mattis’ address, I commented — with edits here — as follows:
Not that it matters, but, I both appreciate and despond over General Mattis’ address here. Appreciate because (1) as a genuine warrior he says what he sees and eloquently and (2) his heart is unalloyed courage and compassion. Despond because (1) his address reflects lack of situational awareness — half his auditors at least regard the nation state, including USA, as obsolete and perishing — and (2) his address, although latterly specifying or implying serious tactical weaknesses of current operations, transits the periphery of his title: grand national strategy.
It is rare for a military leader to grasp and execute the several strands — principally diplomatic, economic and military, but others as well — of grand national strategy sufficiently to create a rational grand national strategic *objective* that is also inspirational. It is rare for anyone to be able to do that. General David Petraeus has that ability, which is why the Anti-American, Globalist-partisan US Justice [so-called] Department is persecuting/prosecuting him. Asking Congress or a bureaucracy to develop that ability and execute with it compares with asking a herd of cats to organize an expedition to summit Annapurna. Distilling and serving a happy grand national strategic *objective* is a personal, leadership thing few can do, but some definitely can and do accomplish. Their thoughts merit discovery and attendance.
The cynosure of a nation is not her grand national strategy. It is her grand national strategic *objective.* Given what we see now, project and anticipate — always expecting the unexpected, as General Mattis mentions, thankfully, in his address — where and what do we want to be as a nation three, five, ten, etc. years hence? What is our objective? What do we really, truly — as a nation — want for and of ourself to be, to do, to think? What is our inner necessity as a nation? What are we on this earth to accomplish as a national presence? And why do members of Congress not live in the states from which they were selected for office?
Related: On 04 March 2015 Marine GEN (Ret.) James N. Mattis wrote for Hoover Institution under title Using Military Force Against ISIS. I commented:
I am content that GEN (Ret.) Mattis’ thinking, clear and compelling, be expressed in public. Thank you, General! Our countrymen are working their way towards how they will think and what they will do when they are quit of the hag riding their back. And they will be that. This exercise in preparation for the restoration of national sovereignty and wealth flowing from national moral and intellectual strength is what should be happening and what is happening. I am content.
Update VI: Stephen D. Krasner embodies the bathetic stupidity of America’s ruling class. I commented:
Good enough governance. Sounds micro-managerial, timid, sophistical/Solomonic and Ivory Tower. And a military not tasked with winning a war/conflict? … words fail and casting aspersions is unmanly. I prefer colonization and culture-splicing. Solve the problem, don’t manage it. It is unmanageable. Defeat it or detach from it. Do not manipulate/manage it.
Update VII: Michael J. Totten reviews ISIS: Inside the Army of Terror
Update VIII: The Kingpin Strategy … it fails!
Actually, the kingpin strategy as this author presents it is a misread of the strategy that eliminated Pablo Escobar and a mis-learning of the lessons thereof. Escobar was reached — by US military, as I recall, not DEA or CIA — by working inward from his perimeter protections, eliminating those piecemeal, until none was left to protect the boss who had been their center. That is how Pablo came to be running alone on a roof. None remained to protect him, all had been neutralized. Other networks than Pablo’s increased the flow of cocaine into the USA following his death. Had kingpin strategy been applied to Pablo, his own network would have decentralized and, probably with others, even more ramped up the flow of product to American nostrils.
Conclusion: a network is taken down by movement from its periphery towards its center, not by direct movement at its center. See also the elimination of Saddam Hussein — in a rat hole without protection. If other networks move to replace or even restore an eliminated network — a near certainty, at least by effort — then the same strategy is applied to them, one at a time or several simultaneously, as assets permit.
Expose the queen by killing off her guardians. Then kill the queen. If the queen only is killed, up front, her guardians will anoint a new queen and proceed merrily onward with conjurings from their fevered minds.
Update IX: Scott Johnson at Power Line links two videos of Senator Tom Cotton discussing USA foreign policy. These are instructive, depressingly so. I commented as follows:
I have attended, carefully, both videos mentioned here. Senator Cotton is a good man, a fine man. His intellect, heart and bona fides are unimpeachable. He walks point for the best intentions and thinking our nation’s official leader cadre can produce at this moment in time.
His grasp of American strategic objective, strategy and tactics so lags the need as to arouse disconsolation.
This is not a personal failure of Senator Cotton’s. It is a corporate failure of America’s leader cadre. And behind them it is a failure of America’s parents (in particular, mothers, but also fathers), schools, churches and synagogues to foster spiritual, cultural and moral infrastructure that builds and protects our mother country.
Update 10: Spengler: Balance Of Power – The Board Game
Update 11: Why It’s Time for the Carrier Battle Group
Update 12: Contemplating Positions On Chinese Flanks
AUM NAMAH SHIVAYA
