Three Brothers Doctrine Rationale, Nature, Objectives, And Implementations Précis Three Brothers Doctrine is an allegiance alliance to guarantee expanding freedom, safety, and prosperity in each of the world’s three sovereign leader nation states. World War II and Cold War are won and done. Structures made to standardize and regulate inter-nation relations before and after those victories are defunct, deformed, or obsolete.
 Needed are fresh structures to standardize and regulate inter-nation relations. None producing freedom, safety, and prosperity for the generality exist.
 Authority to create and maintain those structures belongs to three brother countries because of their prototypical character as, each of them, a united multi-racial, multi-religious sovereign nation state.
 Those Three Brothers countries are: India, USA, and Russia.
 Their responsibility is to steward inter-nation relations in the direction already embodied by each of them internally, namely, multi-racial, multi-religious unity: E Pluribus Unum. Rationale Three Brothers Doctrine is developed as fundamental replacement for structures, developed from the ending of World War II, that standardized and regulated inter-nation relations so as to benefit the victorious countries, restore the losing ones, and mentor the others. Those structures, such as NATO, SACEUR/SHAPE, Bretton Woods, ANZUS, OAS, and UN, are either functionally defunct (Bretton Woods) or functionally deformed (NATO, UN) by long years of human neglect or cussedness on the one hand and obsolescence by history’s ways and means on the other. Essentially, it is not 02 September 1945. Nor is it 26 December 1991. What was done to make those kairotic moments occur at all, and then to fashion the general welfare, is come and gone. Everyone knows that. The world cries out for structures, attentive to current and best-anticipated conditions, which standardize and regulate inter-nation relations. The wine is new. It deserves new skins to hold up in. That is the rationale of Three Brothers Doctrine. Time it is to construct, to demonstrate fecundity of spirit. Nature Three Brothers Doctrine is an allegiance alliance comprising three culturally essential, strategically productive, and indefatigably sovereign nation states: India, USA, Russia. The alliance is across the three vectors of statecraft: diplomacy, finance, and war-fighting. It is more than a treaty. It is a resolve to steward inter-nation relations in the direction already embodied each internally by the Three Brother nation states, namely, multi-racial, multi-religious unity: E Pluribus Unum. That realization of multi-racial, multi-religious unity within a sovereign nation state is the prototype of personal and national freedom, safety, and prosperity now and as futurely as this writer can anticipate. It is also the basis for a nation’s sustaining sovereignty in inter-nation relations. E Pluribus Unum is the strongest possible guarantee of national independence and personal freedom. The generality accept and follow leaders who protect them, remove obstacles from their paths, and regulate their activities fairly. Objectives The first objective of Three Brothers Doctrine is to recognize, respect, and protect India, USA, and Russia as preeminent authority in the immediate area of their being: India in South and South East Asia and Southern Africa, USA in The New World, Russia from Brest to Uelen. The second objective of Three Brothers Doctrine is to quieten the Middle East and North, East, and West Africa. This means convincing the proponents of Arab/Pan-African Imperialism (aka Caliphism) — and any they inspire, anywhere they are — that their hope is forlorn. It means obtaining their renunciation of aggression, which includes their renunciation of violence for a name of God, or a book, or a man, however sacred or holy. The third objective of Three Brothers Doctrine is to triangulate China. This means, ultimately, obtaining China’s renunciation of aggression, which includes Her renunciation of violence in the name of anything. Proximately, it means demonstrating to China that She is a kill-zone from three directions, by three overwhelming weapons systems, with no means of shelter or escape. The three directions are the Three Brothers’ geographies. The three weapons systems are the three vectors of statecraft (diplomacy, finance, war-fighting), operated three each by three users, so, nine altogether. Again proximately, it also means demonstrating to China that her economy is artificial and dependent, and, therefore, she will accede to the Three Brothers’ wishes. The fourth objective of Three Brothers Doctrine is to inoculate the rest of Europe against the racial and religious chaos France/Belgium, Germany/Austria, and to some extent Italy and Greece have heaped upon themselves in spasms of weaponized empathy against The Church. The other nations of Europe — especially Poland and Spain — deserve to be invited to participate in Three Brothers structures for fostering inter-nation relations. Let France/Belgium, Germany/Austria, Italy, and Greece renounce the fantasy of multi-cultural political unity (Globalism) before they receive invitation to the Three Brothers’ party. There can be multi-racial and multi-religious but not multi-cultural political unity. Politics is downstream from culture. Religion and race are upstream from culture. Religions and races can decide for one culture with political unity. Politics can neither create nor unite multiple cultures because it is a product of culture and therefore is of authority inferior to that of culture. Politics has to go with what is given it by culture because it does not form culture. Religions and races do form cultures and therefore have authority to tell cultures how to go. Authority belongs to those who can make and name. Religion is the substance of culture and culture is the form of religion. Paul Tillich Islam is a culture, to include a politics, made by a race and a religion. Its Salafist and Shiite iterations — in common with most of its others — have no intention whatsoever of being or tolerating multi- anything. France/Belgium, Germany/Austria, Italy, and Greece have given themselves over to hegemonic Islam — mostly Salafism — and to catastrophic battle, again, on their own soil. Thus, the objectives of Three Brothers Doctrine include inoculating the rest of Europe against the insanity, and its consequences, of those four. The fifth objective of Three Brothers Doctrine is to foster ASEAN tranquility with respect to Salafism and Shiism and with respect to commercial honesty, fairness, and viability in member nations. This includes admitting to Three Brothers structures ASEAN nations self-protecting from hegemonic Chinese geographical and economic aggression. Implementations Ask the Hashemites how much of the Arabian Peninsula south of Iraq they would like in their stewardship and gift it to them. Ask the Universal House of Justice how much of Iran they would like their friends to steward and gift it to them. Kill mullahs combatant commanders. Kill imams tactical commanders. Kill ayatollahs strat-intel commanders. And blow out their Mosques, Islamic Centers, and Madrassas armories, command posts, and war colleges. Extirpate China’s claim to sovereignty over the South and East China Seas by means of a competing sovereignty comprising an alliance of nation states led by the Three Brothers: India, USA, Russia. China’s economic precarity, conjured by Her unfair trade practices and agreements — and slavery — may be the easiest way to accomplish this mission. Give Mexico to understand that She collapses, pronto, the drug and rare goods trafficking cartels or the USA will do it for Her, pronto, with full-spectrum assets. Give Afghanistan, Colombia, Sicily, Calabria, Burma, and Thailand the same understanding, and from all Three Brothers. Remind wise guys in Latin America and the Caribbean that they and their families are only in office or power for life. Inform Latin Americans that The Monroe Doctrine contemplates the ideology of Socialism (aka Leftism, aka Progressivism) as among the hostile foreign powers forbidden by the USA from operating in The New World. For the reality that prosperity engendered by freedom and security is the best protection against invasion and other wretchedness, ensure the Intermarium (modernly: Three Seas Initiative) is politically free in its several nation states and economically prosperous as a region of sovereign nation states. The invasion contemplated here is from west to east, as is most historically precedented and capable, not from east to west, which the Intermarium also has suffered with great affliction through the centuries. The Intermarium as free, Christian, prosperous, sovereign states are Russia’s best defense against invasion by West German Tribes, or now, by Salafist hordes installed by West German Tribes on Russia’s western flank. Halt China’s colonization of Siberia, which aims to deny Russia direct egress onto the Pacific Ocean and the USA untrammeled use of the same. Summary Everyone knows that the allegedly regnant, soi-disant post-nation stochastic structure called Globalism/Salafism is stupid and merits brush-off, in toto, by operating authorities focused on standardizing and regulating inter-nation relations to favor freedom, safety, and prosperity within and among nations. What everybody does not know is: what operating authorities can do that? Three Brothers Doctrine answers that question. Three Brothers Doctrine is the system in modern conditions for achieving the USA Grand National Strategic Objective (GNSO): sovereign nationhood secured by
 decisive defensive-offensive capability in diplomacy, finance, and war-fighting, and
 fair trade with fellow sovereign nation states. Questions And Answers Question: Do only civilian officials bear responsibility for GNSO? Answer: All Officers of the United States of America, civilian and military, directly, necessarily, and unavoidably embrace the reality — and must cultivate it — of the USA Grand National Strategic Objective (GNSO).  Some think the USA GNSO is civilian Officers’ responsibility.  It is all Officers’ responsibility and all are accountable, equally, for cultivating it at each day’s fresh challenge to it in their position, whatever that is. Here is the Logos of this phenomenon: The U.S. Constitution, in common with all national constitutions, declares to the world a sovereign nationhood, specifically that of the United States of America. By definition, the U.S. Constitution establishes USA national sovereignty — not national security, which can be parsed — as the USA GNSO. Officers of the United States of America swear to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States. Their Oath of Office makes all Officers of the United States, civilian and military, pro-active fiduciaries of the USA GNSO. QED Question: If sovereign nationhood is the central theme of a GNSO discussion, what, in context of Three Brothers Doctrine, should one make of Russia meddling in the sovereignties of Her near abroad? Answer: Russia’s threat from the west is not from Her near abroad, aka the Intermarium states.  It is from the Germanic Tribes west and north of Poland. Historically, Russia’s defense against that threat is to occupy the Intermarium as a land and industry buffer (e.g., Ukraine, or at least Crimea, Baltics, and Poland).  Not unreasonable from her perspective.  But also not ideal, because occupation costs time, money, and energy, makes an occupied population sullen and depresses their productivity and invention.  So an occupation has to become ever more oppressive, just to make things work reasonably well, and that screws down the lid on the pressure cooker, so to speak, that finally blows (Hungary ‘56, Czechoslovakia ’68, Poland late ‘80s).  No way to run a railroad long-term and have the land mass function as you want, as protection from a more distant but salient threat: the Germanic Tribes. Far easier and more effective is to constitute the Intermarium nations as free, independent, sovereign, and prosperous — and therefore WANTING to protect THEMSELVES from the Germanic Tribes . . . and in the event protecting also Mother Russia.  Same result, from Russia’s point of view, but far easier, more affordable, and far, far more able to last long-term, because the prosperity and sovereignty of the near abroad (aka Intermarium) keeps producing the ability of those sovereign states to self-defend. The Three Brothers — and other sovereign states — can do very much in all three vectors of statecraft — diplomacy, finance, war-fighting — to, essentially, help the Intermarium states maintain sovereignty by building adequate self-defense and prospering fair trade with whomever.  The same activity would calm Russian nerves, especially when conducted within the rubric of the Three Brothers alliance.  Russia knows the Intermarium states even, if not especially, as prosperous-sovereign, are not a threat to Russia’s borders or interior.  Indeed, in the condition of prosperous-sovereign, the Intermarium states are exactly as Russia wants of her near abroad: quiet, buffering protection.  USA GNSO implementations would do self-service to include facilitating that development. Besides occupation of Her near abroad, Russia as the Soviet also spent decades subverting Europe with the objective of inducing her, through her academic faculties and clerical benches, voluntarily to adopt leftist-socialist attitudes and narratives (aka fairy-tales) and create leftist-socialist institutions, thus spiking the Germanic Tribes’ martial spirits by deadening their spirits generally.  This Cheka/NKVD/KGB active measures program succeeded in producing the EU, aka Soviet Europe. However, like occupying the Intermarium (the near abroad, modernly: Three Seas Initiative), subversion of Germanic belligerence does not neutralize it — much less extirpate it — long-term.  In this case, it worked well enough so long as the USA guaranteed quiet on the EU’s frontiers — lulling, thereby, EU nations to submerge and saturate in the Cheka/NKVD/KGB enchantment (aka fairy-tale) called disarmament. Now, however, with that guarantee fading away, Germanic belligerence again ascends and again threatens Russia. And not only so.  The Germanic Tribes misused the luxury of USA protection to implement their academic faculties’ and clerical benches’ most absurd fantasy (conjured by Cheka/NKVD/KGB active measures): that Christian charity, misappropriated to humanist multi-cultural-ism, conjures political unity from systemic cultural hostility: Moslems, after all, are such nice people, just so eager to get along with Christians in Christian culture by operating their production and governing institutions, are they not?  Aren’t they?  Aren’t They?  Guys … ? Thus a new, determined, and very bitter Arab/African/Turkish threat also is poised and chafing from inside Germanic lands — thanks to Germanic lunacy — to invade eastward across the Intermarium and into Mother Russia.  Because Russia is a multi-racial, multi-religious Christian culture.  Socialists/Salafists envy and therefore hate Christian cultures.  Russia sees this now double threat in Her west and south: Germanic Socialism AND Arab/African/Turkish Salafism.  German efficiency indeed. Russia’s totalist past has not helped her conceptualize a strategic objective sufficient to guarantee the Intermarium as safe space between Russia and the Germanic Tribes. But today, with a dry and competent leader, she is capable and even desirous of making that happen.  Three Brothers Doctrine is the way to do it.  Instead of the usual subversion, pouncing, and occupation — which spend vast amounts of time, money, and energy for very little actual gain in safety or prosperity — Russia, in allegiance alliance with USA and India, should encourage planting sovereign freedom, rising around victorious armed forces, and cultivating fair trade productivity, rising around fair regulation, within the Intermarium’s sovereign nation states.  What does She have to lose? Summary: Intermarium (the Russian near abroad, modernly: Three Seas Initiative), comprising sovereign, prosperous nation states, is Russia’s best play for Russian sovereignty on Russia’s western and southern borders. USA and India can facilitate that circumstance, among others, to The Three Brothers' mutual benefit, which is the nations' benefit. December 2016 Washington, USA The Rev. David R. Graham was birthed September 23, 1943 in Indiana, raised in California, and educated in California and New York. He accepted Ordination through the United Church of Christ in Arizona and Confirmation in The Episcopal Church in California. He has resided in California, New York, Arizona, Montana, New Mexico, and Washington. He has provided for his wife and their children by helping raise thoroughbred horses and drive public transit. He is a Church Organist and Theologian, or alternatively, Mystical Philosopher. Points of contact: nobody.108.11529@gmail.com 206-954-9407 A U M N A M A H S H I V A Y A